Yes I agree with your points.
Dunning-Kruger effect
Sample size of 1 is not indicative of anything though... several entire families I know were in it when I checked, even people that have been dead for decades, still had their name, address history, DOB, SSN and phone number.
Personally I consider this way bigger than previous ones because of how accessible the data is. I could never find the previous Experian one, but there's several sources for this one now, and seems to have a lot more information in it.
I wasn't the one who said that, but I agree with you.
So... where's the source?
I have, and so have many others, which is why we disagree.
whoa there them's fightin' words
I think an awful lot of people would disagree with you on that one
Isn't this just a cat-and-mouse or whack-a-mole situation? If the people who create these block lists can also see the new IPs just by having that service, they can also add them to block lists.
refalo
0 post score0 comment score
Isn't this basically the same thing as clicking a .apk or .exe link in a browser (which already works on mobile/desktop)?