[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Isn't this basically the same thing as clicking a .apk or .exe link in a browser (which already works on mobile/desktop)?

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Yes I agree with your points.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Dunning-Kruger effect

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sample size of 1 is not indicative of anything though... several entire families I know were in it when I checked, even people that have been dead for decades, still had their name, address history, DOB, SSN and phone number.

Personally I consider this way bigger than previous ones because of how accessible the data is. I could never find the previous Experian one, but there's several sources for this one now, and seems to have a lot more information in it.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

I wasn't the one who said that, but I agree with you.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

So... where's the source?

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

I have, and so have many others, which is why we disagree.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

whoa there them's fightin' words

I think an awful lot of people would disagree with you on that one

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Isn't this just a cat-and-mouse or whack-a-mole situation? If the people who create these block lists can also see the new IPs just by having that service, they can also add them to block lists.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

refalo

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago