ringwraithfish

joined 1 year ago

The way I see it: PC has a high upfront cost with minimal maintenance/upgrade cost to continue using it with newer releases for years.

Consoles have a cheaper upfront cost but no maintenance/upgrade. Once it's obsolete (as determined by the industry, not the owner) then you are forced to buy a new console for new releases.

For me, in practice, I know for a fact that I have spent less on my PC components and games than I would if I wanted the same experience on a console.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 17 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I've been a PC gamer for 3 decades. Most budget conscious PC gamers I know upgrade individual components as needed. Done this way, you can easily get more for your money than having to buy a new console every cycle.

Holy fuck that's hilarious. I'm definitely going to start slipping this into real life conversations with my ultra conservative family members.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think he's talking about the next Mass Effect game.

The game console industry proved this was a viable business plan a couple of decades ago.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They probably realized it's not profitable because 90% of a user's visits are home, work, store... wash rinse repeat day in and day out. They can probably get more meaningful data from the person through their other various tracking methods.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Are ransom attacks on the rise in recent months? Any sites that track these sort of things?

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 18 points 5 months ago

Good. I hope more forced live service games flop so execs will get it in their heads it's ok not to make a live service game and still make money from it.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 19 points 5 months ago (3 children)

How to start a fight with an etymologist...

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Only a matter of time for another Challenger incident to set space exploration back another 20 years.

I think most in society get that human space exploration is extremely risky, but to flirt with that risk with a known variable tipping the scales the wrong way seems like a business decision rather than an engineering one.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 56 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Just a reminder to everyone that it's fun to hope it's aliens, but Occam's Razor suggests it isn't and the real answer is likely something naturally occurring.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 48 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They of course me c-level executives, not us plebians who do actual work.

view more: ‹ prev next ›