Rayman 2 PS1, Rayman 1 PS1, Rayman Rush PS1, Rayman Arena PS2, Rayman 3 PS2, Rayman Origins Wii, Rayman Legends PS3 and Switch.
rob200
joined 4 months ago
They want to squeeze out that extra bit of profit and get the users that never subscribed on there so they can boast about improved numbers.
if your internet can handle the bandwith for cloud gaming app Luna can do wonders.
Why does Mozilla need ad dollars? Firefox is open source? If they don't have a search engine what buisness do they feel thatvthey need this? Ads in Firefox potententially incoming??
If they would just stick with Firefox and nothing else they would be alright but they just keep doing things their userbase won't like. They keep rissing their own expenses, for what? And wonder why no one uses Firefox. I wonder why.
The android app is about as clunky like Chrome even though it doesn't need to be. Try other open source browsers like Lighting, which can view most modern sites and are just better made and don't feel clunky and slugish.
The day they announced vpn services I dropped from Firefox. Because now its going to be more expensive for them. And they did more since then.
But hey, atleast we have Falkon browser. Except for being based on WebKit the browser itself isn't currently maintained by an ad company.
Is Mozilla still nonprofit or are they changing their moto?
Where is the demand for ai on Firefox?
One thing I'll give Facebook credit for in the case of content moderation is, Facebook is not decentralized like the Fediverse compared to on Lemmy, Misskey or Mastodon and etc.
Facebook has a whole centralized platform to moderate with all users. Compared to the Fediverse this moderation can be tough and very expensive. Facebook would have to pay a lot of moderators.
There are some problems known to occur however
There are some things that can slip through but with all this ai training more companies are moving towards ai moderation over human moderation that should reduce moderation costs and their profitability.
Some content Facebook doesn't seem to tackle unless a government complains to them, particularly if they know its something they know generates them money.
Boooo Microsoft Windows
I am interested in this concept of currency, looking forward to see it more in practice after this comes out. (i'm based in the u.s not the e.u)
Since you asked, and I commented on Lemmy about this before.
Back in the Windows XP and even Windows 7 days Microsoft was trying to sell computers to people. It had to convince people why computers are worth their time.
Fast forward to Windows 10 and now it's, "ok we now got an audience that's addicted to our operating system, lets see what we can get away with. We might lose like 1% to Linux and like 5% to mac doing some of these while most of everyone won't switch at all. and we increase our profits."
Microsoft could care less about your PCs resources when you're idk, playing some 4k or even 8k video games. What a joke, but for real, if any of you use WIndows at home and don't want to jump straight to Linux. You can (temporally jump over to Chromebooks, which will mostly work out of the box, and has support for Linux apps.
Chromebook's I would argue are perfect for getting users use to Linux apps without having to worry about losing any familiarity they might have with Something like WIndows or Mac.
There was a post about this on lemmy awhile ago, I'm not sure which specific community it was i'm subscribed to a few tech related ones, but it was atleast a week or 2 or more ago about this same story.
I do agree that there should be more workers than 30 on one of the most known encrypted messaging apps.