i got work

I'm fine reviewing, if I'm familiar with the task, codebase and especially if I've been involved with the proposed technical solution.

reviewing gen code? Hell, NO!

agreed. having a cryptography mark on the file and relying on chain of trust is the way.

except for intuition formed from a lifetime of daily usage

yeah, but they do go after people that organized the protest and arrest them.

in programming, tx is the abbrev for transaction sometime. also for "transmit" in the context of receive and transmit when a stream (of data) is duplex (both ways). I never questioned the tx abbrev until now, but just yesterday I used it. hmm

edit: apparenty it's pure coincidece between tx for transaction and tx part of duplex abbrevs.

your machines

git add remote laptop ...

imo, it's fake as it's a "wate of time"

or with ll alias for ls -laF, I'm using it so often, even if it's not available, I still type it 5 times a minute.

it's not your car tho

this ain't a criminal court. It's ok to be helpful to a degree, especially if a bunch of people can't work because of that issue.

yea but the counter was that they need to move fast.

In the beginning, tests slow you down, but in time, the amount of bugs tests catch and the confidence in refactoring adds up to way more saved time.