There's a link at the very top of the article, if you click on it, you will get another article and there you can find many links that take you to the relevant studies
solo
Your framing makes it seem like earlier feminists realized their errs and opened up
I really don't know where you got that impression. I specifically talk about feminism, so that the focus is on an intergenerational time-frame.
My point is that it’s the achievement of intersectionalism, not of feminism
I am not familiar with the term intersectionalism. I know that intersectionality started as a term for legal analysis coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw and then was adopted by feminists because it created a helpful analytical framework.
A few more words to clarify a couple of stuff.
The way I see things, the current wave of feminism is using the analytical tool of intersectionality which allows mistakes of the past to be addressed and not to be repeated.
Last time I checked, I also concluded that terfs are still a thing. For me, there is nothing radical in being a transphobe, so I think we should just call them that: transphobes. They can call themselves feminists, the word is out there for anyone to use. And this is why every time someone tells me they are a feminist I ask them and/or try to see how they see intersectionality so I know to who I am talking (if they are westerners, that is). And I hope by now it is clear, I don't go into conversations defending the purity of movements.
Personnally, I do not reproduce quotes that haven't age well. The OP, you and everyone do as you want. I am not quote- police or something.
I find it weird you mention the 'no true Scotsman" fallacy for TERFs. The acronym means Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist.
This is in part the older, gender neutral usage of “man” meaning “human” and in part ignorance about woman issues.
Sure, in good faith we need to take into account the historical background. Still, the quote "If you're a man, you take it" in 2026, sounds more like something coming from the manosphere.
There were black women who felt left out both from black liberation movements and from feminism.
This is why feminism evovled to be intersectional.
OP, why do you believe this Nick Shirley person? Everything he has done so far has been debunked through fact-checking.
You are right in the sense that it looks like the author is a real person, because they appear to have linked a linkedin profile (I say appear because right now I cannot access my linkedin account to veryfy it).
Nevertheless, if you copy-paste the text in this AI detector it says that it is 100% AI generated.
I'm sorry but this video is distoring the term epigenetics. Epigenetics is not a something that started happening in our era, it was simply something that was discovered recently.
Epigenetics is the study of changes in gene expression that occur without altering the DNA sequence. [...] Epigenetics usually involves changes that persist through cell division, and affect the regulation of gene expression. Such effects on cellular and physiological traits may result from environmental factors, or be part of normal development. [wiki]
Wenders said the film would be withdrawn from "all current forms of distribution and exhibition", meaning "streaming services, television broadcasters and distribution partners will be instructed to cease public access to the film".
Wenders said he would seek a "broad dialogue" with film institutions and groups, and only after reaching "a mutually agreed solution, which will include Nastassja Kinski, will we make the film available again".
Thank you for mentioning this. I wanted to write something similar in the description and totally forgot