spiphy

joined 1 year ago
[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

There’s no good reason for these pieces of shit to exist.

Have you considered the profits of the auto industry?

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Not really, cars are faster and more deadly. People had to be somewhat careful. The auto industry invented a slur (jaywalking) to convince people the street was no a place for people outside of a car. Look up old footage of cities, people are everywhere in the street.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Things can be done about it, but one party will never vote against one of their own

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't it actually be water valleys? If you are standing on the shore and watched a boat go up a water mountain at the horizon it would stay visible, there would have to be a valley for the boat to disappear.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 83 points 1 year ago (61 children)

I think this is in response to stupid large truck vs kei truck thread that made the front page. All the car brains are going on about how everyone ever needs a stupid large truck to tow 85 boats at once

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

When I had my roof replaced last year the shingles were delivered by a large flat bed semi with a conveyor belt to get the shingles on the roof. The guys doing the work showed up the next day in small cars. I doubt may people are rolling up to replace a roof with a truck bed full of shingles and carrying them up a ladder.

Large trucks do have uses in a few very limited places but the vast majority in the US are not needed. Looking at self reported usage of truck owners most would be better served with a smaller more economical car and renting a truck as needed. Even people hauling regularly would probably benefit having a kei truck.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Given the usage patterns, most people in the US do not need large trucks. They have been convinced that need them because the auto manufacturers make a lot of money selling trucks.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

The argument against mixed use is often that they don't want to be forced to live in a mixed use area, but the same people are fine with forcing everyone to live how they want. Most likely they only want single family homes because they have never experienced good mixed use and can't imagine how great it is.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago

The line about the officials claiming qualified immunity really makes me angry. Qualified immunity is such garbage. The actual law says they can be used, but the courts made up qualified immunity so they could ignore it.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Bicycles deliver the freedom auto ads promise

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

They were redesigned for cars. Mistakes of the past can be fixed.

view more: next ›