There are really too many flaws to spend time writing a whole essay on it, but okay, for example:
Freedoms of others, including freedom to offend, must be respected. One who violates the freedom of others gives up their freedom
What about the freedom to hold your own beliefs, which you would do away with in the very next rule?
This is the kind of thing I would've come up with in my early teens when I first discovered sociology.
7 was still tolerable. Went to 10 after that and didn't like it, but needed it for gaming.
2002, started with Gentoo and kept at it until maybe 2010 when I stopped with Linux because my laptop died. Started again with Ubuntu MATE around 2017. Switched to Mint in 2024.
Damn straight. It's been said that the biggest obstacle for Linux on desktop is other Linux users.
Lizards may be scary, but nothing can beat the dreaded Starfleet double-hand punch.
Yeah, I have keywords for the usual suspects as well, but that requires them to be mentioned by name in the title, and it doesn't cover US politics not involving those.
I wish people would limit US politics to comms designated for that, rather than forcing the rest of us to wade through that filth looking for world news. It's already all over every other news source.
I was walking down the street on a rainy day, and saw a father and his kid walking the opposite way. The dad looked as annoyed as you possibly could by the rain. The kid was the complete opposite, he was having a blast hopping around and splashing the water. Brightened my day. It's been years, but I still remember it and use it as a reminder not to take life too seriously.
I used my Sennheiser True Momentum 4s on a 14+ hour flight, they were very comfortable and the noise cancelling was excellent. Battery lasted for about 8-9 hours.
Whose common sense? Are you going to legislate the definition of that too?