swicano

joined 3 years ago
[–] swicano@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

This is just standard "ram/chips are so expensive now that all consumer devices had to raise prices and thus sold less". With maybe a little general reduction in overall consumer spending?

[–] swicano@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It does seem like the open-weight models don't have easily monetizable adjacent money streams like support and services, best they have is inference cost. But the whole point of the open weights is that anyone else can come and take that part from them. It's a tough place to be in if the goal is only profitability. But since AI was declared a national security thing here in the US, the strategic value of ensuring we don't end up dominating global AI is probably worth it. And a steal at the 500mil per year loss they claim.

I do wonder what sustainable future looks like for an open weights lab, once we're past this wackiness. A very well tuned harness? That's kind of its own product. On-prem seployment support?

[–] swicano@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Well you see they both end in -berg and fatberg is a bad thing

[–] swicano@programming.dev 49 points 1 week ago

Seems legit. Click the link

[–] swicano@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fingers crossed it sticks around, even if this entry had some issues, It's better than a developer throwing everything out and only working on continuing the 2 hits they made 20+ years ago

[–] swicano@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

One thing that I wasn't sure of, does one xbox studios' co-developers (aka sub contractors) count as 'vendor spend' in the budget, or are those folded into the project/studio budget and the 'vendor spend' that Xbox called out only refers to subs not under a single studio

[–] swicano@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't remember if supernote is OSS, but I've got the A6, and I think they got an A5 and A4 sized one. Pricey though.

[–] swicano@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I was looking for a like-to-like comparison, but Noone really makes 24 kwh bevs anymore, so I had to compare the 2014 model S p85 (85 kwh) to the 2026 genesis gv60 (85 kwh) to see what the same size battery does. According to the link https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=35994&id=49653&id=49654 the new genesis does significantly better despite weighing more and being larger, BUT almost all the gain comes from city driving. So the efficiency might actually be from just improving the regen algorithms

(Gv60 - 4900 lbs, ModS - 4650 lbs)

But it's also hard to know if the epa testing methodology changed, because articles from around 2014 claimed 265 mile epa range, but the site shows 242.

Edit: oh the 265 vs 242 is single vs dual motor, dual motor is the better comparison

[–] swicano@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

2011 is basically just the Nissan leaf, right?

[–] swicano@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't that guy who clipped the firefighting plane get banned from drones and like $100,000 in repair costs + penalties? Seems like a pretty good deterrent to me

[–] swicano@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

They can violate faa regs and also leave their remoteID on accidentally. It might not be that hard

[–] swicano@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

But which one is chocolate and which one is vanilla

view more: next ›