Eh, this seems like a niche enough kink that it's your own fault for thinking this sounds dirty. I'm kinda annoyed I know about it now. You should delete this post.
Also religious people:
Trying to force public schools to post the ten commandments.
Your first point is not true. There are valid uses of memory sharing that rust will reject.
You gave it a generous amount of your time. I'd say if you don't like it in the first few episodes it might not be for you. I was hooked almost immediately.
What if one day you woke up and your nipples were completely gone like no scars or anything just flat skin and then once you leave your room you find out your dad died last night and several days later you find out that your entire life he had been sneaking in your room while you slept and sucking on your chest to make two gigantic hickeys where your nipples should be because you were born without them not for any sexual reason just so you would fit in...
I like this joke format of answering a question with seemingly irrelevant facts that still answer the question. Hit me with some more.
If anyone ever told a believable lie and then called you gullible, that's stupid.
The point of "messing with someone" is to toe the edge of what is believable to see how they react. If you end up straying into the realm of "totally unbelievable" without an incredulous reaction, then the label of "gullible" is deserved.
It's like a friendly duel of wits. An opportunity to sharpen each other's blades without any stakes. Probably a social survival mechanism.
Call me basic, but I have no shortage of new music from Spotify and YouTube. Spotify recommendations plus shared playlists from friends. There are a handful of YT channels that host pretty consistent quality musicians, like NPR Tiny Desk, KEXP, Colors Studios, Zildjian Live.
Sure! Here's a 100PB thumb drive.
I have a feeling you are misunderstanding what is meant by "theorems for free" here. For example, one theorem that is proven by all safe Rust programs is that they don't have data races. That should always be a requirement for functional software. This is a more pragmatic type of automatic theorem proving that doesn't require a direct proof from the code author. The compiler does the proof for you. Otherwise the theorem would not be "free" as stated in OP.
For parties: just buy more pizza
tatterdemalion
0 post score0 comment score
I'm not autistic but I like most of these things.