CI/CD just became a lot harder when every container needs the users age verified. Not just configured, verified.

How much innovation has there been in the ballpoint pen in the last decade?

That's a great rundown with decent logic & examples behind each point.

I think the biggest point is the takeoff weight.

If the impact/evac/safety aspects can be addressed, the only way I can see it working is to add a "cattle class" that's like $10 cheaper than current economy and has something like 40 "seats".
Then increase the price of what is currently economy class by $10-20.
You lose $400 because of the new cheaper class, but gain $1,200 to $2,400 by increasing the price of economy (considering a 160 seat plane, and convert 40 seats to standing). So, net gain $800-2000. Let's you advertise new cheaper fares, and the price increase isn't hugely egregious when the 40 seats sell out instantly.
I guess it doesn't work on less busy flights if only the 40 cheap seats sell

It's one banana, Michael. What could it cost, $10?

This one is well matured, barrel aged with hints and aromas beyond my palette.
A rare meme in these times, to be sure.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/comical-ali-baghdad-bob

Musk is only "America first" because it's the best place for his business.
He now essentially owns the government.
He has paid a shit ton for the election. He has government contracts.
Elon Musk is America.

When (some) people realise what Elon Musk actually is, what America actually is, they are gonna be disgusted (I know that there are a lot of people that already see this).

America should be awesome.
But it has sold out

Buying extra sets of bed linen is easiest the best money I have spent.

When I was younger, I'd get away with changing less often and rushing the full bed linen through in a day.
Now, I can take a few days to do that laundry, and have fresh bedding whenever I want.
At least 2 sets of bed linen is a fantastic investment

If they are on the same subnet, why are they going via the router? Surely the NIC/OS will know it's a local address within its subnet, and will send it directly; as opposed to not knowing where to send the packet, so letting the router deal with it.

I'm assuming you are using a standard 24 bit subnet mask, because you haven't provided anything that indicates otherwise and the issue you present would be indicative of a local link being used - this possible

At the back-bone scale of the internet, routers actually announce the addresses they are responsible for.
Paths are judged by how specific these announcements are. A router announcing a single IP is the preffered destination, compared to a router that announces a block that contains it. So routers will forward it to whichever router more accurately describes the destination IP.
This makes up part of the calculated Path Cost of various routes to reach a destination.
If router A tries to contact router D and knows that router B and C can both forward that packet, router A will send it to the router that announced the lowest path cost to D.

Its a lot more complicated than that, but that is how datacenters can disappear from the internet (by wrongly announcing they no longer have a path to the IPs inside the datacenter), or how a small ISP can accidentally route the entire internet through their network (by accidentally announcing extremely low path costs). Both of these have happened.
https://blog.cloudflare.com/october-2021-facebook-outage/
https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-verizon-and-a-bgp-optimizer-knocked-large-parts-of-the-internet-offline-today/

So, the internet is both fragile and resilient.
It can route around damage, but cannot deal with mistakes/maliciousness above a certain "ring" of control.

Yeh, docker is sweet. Docker compose is even better.
It's great when you start dockerising things yourself, and stuff just works.

A note, tho. Docker is a brand name. Open Container Initiative (or OCI) is the open source equivalent. Its mostly compatible (IE compatible until you get into the weeds). A lot of the tooling, you can just alias docker for whatever the tool is and it's the same.

I need inspiration and guidance on my investigation roll to read this deep fried meme.

Using the number she phoned the police from, they tracked the phone.
I'm not certain that a tower ping is as accurate as "apartment 1, 42 wallaby way, Sydney", but it would probably get them close to 42 wallaby way, Sydney.
While officers were en-route, the billing address could have been found for that number for a more precise location.
Perhaps there were other indicators from the phone call.
Perhaps this wasn't the first call to emergency services, so that number has previous callout addresses. One of which aligned with the tower ping.
Or perhaps there were enough officers in the area to check everything quickly, and we are only seeing the footage of the successful response.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_tracking

Qualified services can get access to a phones position down to a 50m accuracy, depending on how much network infrastructure there is in the area. This doesn't need any access/permission to/from the phone. It is done solely from the network infrastructure, and relies on the power/timing of signals to/from the phone. IE triangulation/trilateration.
The US treats this under the 4th amendment, however there are likely fast-paths for 911 call responses. Certainly, other countries waive similar privacy rights when there is an imminent threat to life.