Usually incredibly biased papers. Honestly incredible they’re able to find stuff that biased, they must be scrolling past pages and pages of real sources to get to the misinformation.

They said “can” not “have to”. You changed what they said and then attacked that.

And the wiki for the book literally says it’s all unproven conspiracy theories. Like uh…

Wonder why CachyOS isn’t in the group.

Edit: wonder no more. https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/01/cachyos-founder-explains-why-they-didn-t-join-the-new-open-gaming-collective-ogc/

Market share has nothing to do with whether you should care or not. The author also says to care about other chromium browsers, which have the same minuscule share as ff

Why does no journalist ever ask why government officials want Israel to be our ally. Just because they were for x number of years has no bearing on whether or not they should have been or should still be our ally. Russia was our ally, guess what, they’re not anymore. We don’t have to ally ourselves with murderous countries.

The whole interview centers on Israel must be our ally so we must do stuff for them. They shouldn’t fucking be our ally!!! They’ve been committing atrocities for generations at this point!

I’ve never been to a hotel where check in is the end of the time you can show up. Usually it’s the start of the time you can show up. What places limit the time you can show up?

What an absolutely fantastic photo to show the difference between cars and bikes.

I can totally imagine the James May version being like pink panther

I don’t see where it says they’re using your data to see which subs you’re following. It says they’re matching advertisers to subs. E.g. you visit mechanical keyboards you get mechanical keyboard ads…

I mean that most definitely are using your data, but that is not a prerequisite for what the article is about.

Creationists believe the first. For example I’m Christian, but not a moron, so I don’t believe in creationism.

What does this sentence mean