I used to say, "I don't like novels." until I read Foundation
ulterno
joined 1 week ago
You just gave 2 links to places on the internet where people have mentioned it.
So I just invented a game.
I kinda like it a bit.
Of course, I'm not going to tell you its name or its rules, or I will have mentioned it on the internet, which will make it a paradox.
Any chance you’re a lawyer?
Physicists come pretty close too, and guess where you are
Yeah, we are yet to make sure that the drones run on the same OS as the Teslas.
I get it. There's probably 100's of sites with you on them.
Over here, it's pretty rare to have a car that causes a lot of noise.
A few days ago, there was a car crossing me that was quieter than my cycle's hub. And it was an ICE.
Only the "sports" cars and bikes tend to be loud and thanks to petroleum prices (and the vehicle's price itself) are much less in number.
But loudspeakers and fireworks, I cannot bear.
Air pollution? Mine is a smoker's country. People like me are lucky not to be handed the Darwin award.
zangoose github
Oh, I might have mistaken a GitHub site talking about you with your site.
So, I guess I haven't found your GitHub
Just uninstall edge :P
The one paying for it, of course.
Having rules, means we need to be sure everyone follows it. And having a condition in which everyone wants to and strives to follow it, is also something utopian.
So even if the rules turn out to be desirable, a deterrent would be required. Now of course, for the thoughtful, the deterrent would be the possibility of losing long term stability, but for those who only think of immediate gains, you either have to band up (which eventually causes formation of communities and states) or they band up (= bandits) and eventually become kings (the problematic kind).
And then these things come into play:
Cooperation game Pretty good linking of thoughts by Veritasion
Then comes the most important point (or at least what I consider so). Technological progress. Science is very much viable in Anarchy, with most scientist-scientist interactions not really requiring a state in the first place. You just need an incentive structure that is good enough to make maintenance (including prevention of loss of knowledge) and further improvements, a desirable endeavour. And science can take a lot of resources, while not showing any return for a long time.
Depending upon the case, this might incite frustration in those, investing in it for those working on it.
And stagnation is not a possibility. Any attempts at that will just cause a slow downfall.