[niri] my first post <3 gimme some upvotes or I will sudo rm -rf /* by userpi in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
[-] userpi@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Mako better than fnott in:

  • better in handling images (thumbnails) than fnott because fnott lags if there's many notifications with high resolution thumbnails that are displayed at once.
  • It has more anchor positions. you cannot have center-right or top-center anchors in Fnott. Fnott has only 5 anchor positions while Mako has 9.
  • You can restore previous expired notifications with makoctl restore command while fnottctl doesn't has it.

Fnott is better than mako in:

  • You have dynamic width so every notification has it is own width instead of all of them have the same width which is the main reason why I use Fnott.
  • Easier to config.
[niri] my first post <3 gimme some upvotes or I will sudo rm -rf /* by userpi in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
51
[niri] my first post <3 gimme some upvotes or I will sudo rm -rf /* (lemmy.nz)
submitted 3 months ago by userpi@lemmy.ml to c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
7 comments fedilink

WM: niri

distro: arch BTW

terminal: foot

notification: fnott made by the same developer of foot

web browser: qutebrowser

statusbar: i3bar-river and powered by i3status-rs

I made my own bash script to randomize wallpapers that took me long time to make. If you want to try it out: randwall

My dotfiles are not very organized yet that's why I haven't git them for now but I will do soon ....

[river-classic] Minimal and cozy by userpi in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
[-] userpi@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

no dark???????????? are you colorblind?????

userpi

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 6 months ago