Not saying it's nothing, most people just don't count it.
Is that still true if I add vodka to the orange juice?
I'm not the original poster but I think they meant the logo programming language. Basically you write a script which moves a turtle around on the screen and draws a line behind them.
It's unrelated to the Lego plastic bricks
So you are guessing about society 7000 years ago?
Ok yes sauces have calories but who really counts the sauce calories if you are already eating chicken nuggets? Like if you are eating a salad and count the dressing, maybe but the intersection of calorie counting people and chicken nugget eating people can't be very much
Where is it not true?
Granted. A lot of stuff would be different or break if the earth was flat. Op's point was it was a good enough approximation. I was saying that might be true in some cases but it also shows a lack of critical thinking and that's the major issue.
In my experience code review is often about the logic rather than the code itself. For example do you really need to copy the whole user object just to read their username? Can't you just pass the username in as a string instead? Static validation and test suites should already of eliminated any code errors. If you show up to a code review and the code doesn't compile, you're going to have a bad time. Stuff like calculating the same distance between two objects multiple times should be called out in code review, maybe extract that into a function. Reaching out to a database to get the same value repeatedly should be called out, maybe store it as a local variable.
One time I was reviewing some code which interfaces with an external third party piece of hardware which the api required the serial number for licensing. The programmer hard coded the serial number into the code. If we swapped it due to hardware malfunction we would need to update the software. If we got a second one we would need to maintain two code bases. This should be in a configuration file or something. Ai will not catch that. Static testing won't catch this. Test suites running on the piece of hardware we had, wouldn't catch this. Only a human reviewer would.
It was g-code which as another commentator correctly pointed out was used to control a fanuc cnc system.
Basically we made devices which were surgically implanted into your body to send specific electrical signals to your spine and brain for certain medical issues. The electronics were in a metal case so your icky blood and bodily fluids didn't cause shorts. This system was to weld the metal case closed.
If I told you what the purpose of this system was you would be really horrified...
vrek
0 post score0 comment score
Well basically it's just a 'magic number'. If you ban all of those many programs will either break or at minimum suffer sever performance degradation.