I meant "c" pronounced like "see". Like c u as in "see you".

Maybe cloudflare DNS 1.1.1.1?

Did you read the text? It says the name in the first sentence.

To be fair if you are never exposed to it (and judging by the comments that seems to have happened in the US) you can't tell the time by "just looking at it". But analog clocks are objectively simpler to teach to children (let's say three to eight years old).

Which is obviously complete BS. I often use em dashes when I'm not on mobile, my keyboard layout typically is German Extended (E1) which makes them (and many other symbols needed for propper typesetting) accessable pretty easily.

Em dashes are not a sign of AI, but a sign of propper typesetting. They can be a tell if somebody didn't use them before and randomly started using them in emails. But if you don't know somebody and their tools or style of writing saying that they used Chat GPT because they used em dashes is completely ridiculous.

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu deinem Benutzernamen übrigens 🤣

Needs more watermarks

Not if you payed for an "apple" but got compost. But of that's your thing you could try to eat it 🤣

Your example with the absolute values is actually linked in the "Even more ambiguous math notations" section.

Geogebra has indeed found a good solution but it only works if you input field supports fractions and a lot of calculators (even CAS like WolframAlpha) don't support that.

I'm not sure if I'd call it the "scientific" one. I'd actually say that the weak juxtaposition is just the simple one schools use because they don't want to confuse everyone. Scientist actually use both and make sure to prevent ambiguity. IMHO the main takeaway is that there is no consensus and one has to be careful to not write ambiguous expressions.

How does it compare to Nickel (https://github.com/tweag/nickel)?

https://www.airships.net/hindenburg/disaster/myths/