[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Nowadays the hyphen is the only easy dadh to type

That's not true in general. I personally use the German Extended (E1) layout (when I'm not on mobile) and the em dash is super easy to type. There are also lots of other custom layouts used by people who care about typesetting.

Even people that don't internationally care about typesetting sometimes use them because their tool (like Word and some CMS systems) automatically replace hyphens in specific places with em dashes, or substitute straight double quotes with the correct quotation marks (depending on which country you are from)

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Probably because a lot or them (especially _iel) use ~~literal~~ letteral translations, nobody in their right mind would use in everyday conversations. Like in this post with "michmichs".

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

More veggies and less fruit; too much sugar.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

It's not called Meta data by accident 🤣

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

In theory you can because the second law is actually a statistical and probabilistic thing. Currently it looks like that the laws of physics are time direction independent. So if you play a physics simulation forwards and backwards you couldn't tell the difference for a small number of particles so it it actually can (and does on very small time scales) happen that entropy decreases.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

Given the fact that a fair price for a real town sign is about 175€ somebody will probably just rob the vending machine, either to get the money or a sign. Maybe a card only vending machine would work but changing the name to "Fugging" was probably simpler.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

And we'll never hear of that one again.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

The problem is that using those tools no matter how energy efficient will add to the total amount of energy humans use, because even if an AI generates an image faster than a human could, the human still needs 100W constantly.

This doesn't mean, that we shouldn't make it more efficient but let's be honest, more energy efficient AI just means that we would use even more AI everywhere.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But other countries don't "produce" off-site as the US does. https://youtu.be/C7BCZCWlvEc

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago

It depends what you mean by "our best". We try to reduce the risk without sacrificing too much. Wearing a seatbelt is trivial, because there are basically no downsides. We could also half all the speed limits - that would reduce the risk a ton. But we don't do that because people like to drive fast because they (up too a risk balance) value their time more than their life (sounds rough but that's basically what it is).

It's the same with pandemics. Of course a lockdown prevents a lot of deaths, but at what cost? Is it worth it. We wouldn't half all the speed limits to reduce risk?

I'm not against lockdowns in general, for example during the first covid wave because it bought us valuable time to figure out how we proceed, but a lockdown is (figuratively and literally) high cost.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 3 years ago

Hey Sam Harris is that you?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

wischi

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago