Thank you. But are jellyfish really not that far off. Looks like a pretty huge step to me. Jellyfish look complex enough to not just magically reassemble if we grind them through a sieve.

I personally (but I'm not a biologists 🤣) definitely would consider a jellyfish an animal because different cells (at least ot very much looks like that) have different functions and thus throwing it in the meat grinder (even if individual cells are not damaged) I can't imagine how ot could reassemble itself.

But a sponge seems so homogeneous it (I guess) almost doesn't matter what goes where and that's why it can reassemble. That why (I personally) wouldn't think of that as an animal.

Are there other things that are technically animals that are that homogeneous?

Probably because a lot or them (especially _iel) use ~~literal~~ letteral translations, nobody in their right mind would use in everyday conversations. Like in this post with "michmichs".

More veggies and less fruit; too much sugar.

It's not called Meta data by accident 🤣

I don't think that's how it works. If it exactly looks like something protected by laws like copyright or whatever your country uses, I highly doubt that any court would say that it's fine just because it was created by AI.

Who cares. Just say it's inside the home and enjoy your pay day 🤣

There is a leading space in the string itself, so OP is either a top tier troll or put in no effort at at and either way deserves the hate 😄

But other countries don't "produce" off-site as the US does. https://youtu.be/C7BCZCWlvEc

Regarding your first part in general true, but in this case the sheer amount of calculators for both conventions show that this is indeed intended behavior.

Regarding your second point I tried to address that in the "distributive property" section, maybe I need to rewrite it a bit to be more clear.

That's the correct answer if you follow one of the conventions. There are actually two conflicting but equally valid conventions. The blog explains the full story but this math problem is really ambiguous.

Also in German. Word autocorrects that for example.

Any examples? Sounds like you mean the reason why one is excluded from the primes because of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.