this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
92 points (78.8% liked)

Programming

17668 readers
168 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not my blog, but the author's experience reminded me of my own frustrations with Microsoft GitHub.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But you can still understand the gist of the article even if it used that word differently.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The author's made at a new tech breaking an old feature. Seems more to me like a "I wish they kept things the same" than "I wish they changed some stuff around here". Quite the opposite of legacy.

It being the main point of the article bug being used incorrectly in the title is just confusing. That's comparable to somebody always mentioning "wolf" in an article, actually describing a hare and never saying what their definition of a wolf is.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I totally get what you're saying, but wouldn't you rather discuss the content of the article than argue about definitions?

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure, IMO github has had a subpar interface forever. I've always liked Gitlab's interface more. Github has felt behind Gitlab for a while and it feels like the major thing they have going for themselves are Github Actions and marketshare. The interface getting worse is no issue to me as I try not to use it anyway.

It also doesn't seem comprehensible to me that the author prefers Github's blame interface over every git GUI they've used. They don't even say what it is about the interface they find nicer.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I really like GitHub's high contrast themes. But yeah, that's it. I recently moved my code to Codeberg. Have you tried it? I like GitLab too. That was my go to back when GitHub didn't offer free private repos.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 5 months ago

Codeberg looks like a github clone from 2018 or so. I do hope that they take inspiration from other source forges and won't be afraid to experiment to go their own way.

Anti Commercial-AI license