this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2023
495 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

45753 readers
964 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dameoutlaw@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Definitely not. Before people were migrating from Twitter only just to go back

[–] Rhabuko@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't know. The thing with Mastodon is that you wouldn't find people to follow and it lacked features people wanted.

Lemmy here is way more entertaining already. Of course a lot of people will just check it out and go back but I think enough will stick around. Like a small subreddit you enjoy and slowly grows.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Let's hope so! I wish for a slow but steady growth.

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I fear that we wont be so lucky. If a million people try to check out Lemmy at once, all the instances can go down.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Part of the problem is that when a new user starts exploring Lemmy, they see the list of "most popular instances" and are inclined to gravitate towards them, when it's really not necessary to join them to interact with them... As a recent Reddit refugee, that was what I struggled with the most.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Honestly I joined lemmy.ml because it had the description that most closely matched my interests without feeling like I'm joining one single person's home lab experiment. I think we would need a few more large general purpose (vanilla) instances.

On the other hand I wonder if it doesn't make more sense to condense communities/topics into single, topic-specialized servers. I can't imagine, from a UI perspective subscribing to 100 different news communities and another 100 gaming communities and... I feel like the current UI just isn't designed with this in mind.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It'd definitely be neat if there was a way to group those similar communities into single, shared communities between federated instances. Like, if 6 different instances have "Gaming" communities, to have them all effectively grouped into a single one, and also include the "Gaming" communities from any other instances that you federate with in the future.

I think the ideal UX would be to be able to see one "Gaming" community, subscribe to it, and check a box for "Include Similar Federated Communities" or something, and have posts from all of them show up in your feed, without having to individually subscribe to them.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think the ideal UX would be to be able to see one "Gaming" community, subscribe to it, and check a box for "Include Similar Federated Communities" or something, and have posts from all of them show up in your feed, without having to individually subscribe to them.

I see an important hurdle to that: moderation rules are still specific to instances. So "multis" create some side effect UI challenges. In fact I think the current UI lacks reminders about which community you are participating in.

But I really like and support your "Include Similar Federated Communities" suggestion.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

That's a great point about moderation rules; I hadn't considered that... I suppose that does make it difficult.

[–] Woofcat@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I feel some of the regional instances are the best. I.e. I'm on lemmy.ca but can clearly read and post to the other instances. That way the load can be somewhat split on geography.. likely better speeds as well.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Perhaps instances should be promoted according to current and predicted capacity.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That'd be great. Or even show a list of communities, rather than instances, and let the user find some communities that interest them first, then gravitate towards an instance from there (though that might not solve the problem if the most popular communities are from the most popular instances.)

Could even promote smaller instances that are federated with the popular instances, instead of promoting the popular instances directly.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Making the understanding of lemmy's internal infrastructure incumbent upon users seems a bit ... clunky. I work in IT, I get why it works this way, but I don't see how making it so apparent it serves any benefit to users.

If any user can participate in any community regardless of instance, does anything matter other than instance capacity? The sign up could just automatically select an instance on that basis (but also provide the user the option to select one manually).

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the main thing about instance being important is the instance moderation and federation choices. Some people will of course want as hands off as possible, but some instances are certainly not that (one is very explicitly communist for instance IIRC). So ideally you'd pick an instance that fits your moderation goals, followed by one that you have some other affinity for - like the gaming idea. I joined sopuli because of it being Finnish and I have that heritage, even as an American. I also like not having everything hosted in the US so...

I could also easily see some people having multiple identities tied to instance interests. I suggested it would be nice if /r/sysadmin here at /c/sysadmin was not a community on lemmy.ml but actually its own instance, perhaps trying to pull in /r/networking, /r/sysadminjobs, /r/linuxadmin etc. Not only is that more likely to be work related, so you want a "work" identity, but it seems like you'd have the benefit of a group of communities filling the frontpage of the instance with stuff you're likely interested in.

I see this a bit with mastadon with a journo.host vs an infosec.exchange vs my generic vivaldi.social account.

[–] manifex@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I started a networking community on my local… let’s gooooooooo!

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I still see benefits to strong instance identity, it can lead to some interesting dynamics down the line.

But it needs to come with a smooth onboarding process, paired with the ability to easily migrate your account to a new instance with no loss of account history. That second thing also helps with the first one, if you can easily transfer, the choice of instance is much less critical as a user.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I still see benefits to strong instance identity, it can lead to some interesting dynamics down the line.

Such as?

But it needs to come with a smooth onboarding process, paired with the ability to easily migrate your account to a new instance with no loss of account history.

Totally agree. Like I said, I think the instance should be selected automatically (or at least promoted) by available capacity. It could just sort the list by user count to start and maybe start collecting some performance telemetry on instances to fine tune it later.

The account history is a big one, too. It could even be as simple as having the ability to download/upload your account history in a zip file, then it also serves as a backup. You could even schedule it regularly with the right bot or browser extension.

Another thing I just thought of while I was replying to this is that would be really nice to have is cross-instance authentication. It's kind of annoying when I go to a message context, but then I have to go back and find the message in my inbox to reply.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Such as?

So many things could happen, it will be an organic process of evolution. Let's say communities end up consolidating (e.g. one of the gaming communities becomes the prevalent one), then the server that has the super successful community, how will that affect it? Will people want to be on that server because of that community? Will people prefer to use a server that stays topic-agnostic but maybe offers a strong identity (vibe, political leaning, geographic, etc etc) and that's what attracts users?

Maybe those servers don't even have any of the usual suspect of communities, because it's expected the users will go subscribe to the popular one. Maybe it only offers local info threads, or open format / ideology guided discussions.

Or on the other hand will we see more and more specialized servers that are focused around a set of communities from a specific field?

I guess I'm just wondering how it will all fall into place after there is massive growth, it'll definitely be an interesting part of human behavior to observe.

cross-instance authentication

Yeah that is a big one indeed, I was very confused at first why clicking on some links wouldn't work how I expected it to until I realized there were some hard links that would take you to that server's page directly, and since you're not a user there ofc you're not logged in. That could be better.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What we need is a big disclaimer text with a step by step and requests for choosing from less populated servers.

That text needs to be present at every single point of the user journey, not just once.

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I tried like 4 or 5 instanced before settling on lemmy.ml a few days ago because none of them had admissions open.

[–] Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net 1 points 2 years ago

@LoreleiSankTheShip @Obi, Lemmy is fine, but also Mastodon with a lot of instances

[–] Dave 3 points 2 years ago

Mine will be fine. I splashed out and got a VPS with one whole CPU core!

[–] Uncreativechap@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True, I've seen larger websites go down due to Reddit's "hug of death". I imagine that even the limited blackout will take down the more popular instances.

[–] TheDude@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I setup my own instance and will be doubling the resources allocated to it before the 12th. Ill be documenting how it handles whatever is sent my way

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I could never wrap my head around the discoverability and reach issues -- I haven't had any problems with either of those, and I'm running a solo server (though I've come to suspect that there was maybe a jargon and expectation barrier, and they just couldn't overcome the different layout).

What I can understand is running away from the somewhat, uh, hostile welcome many of them got. Instead of bringing people in and helping them acclimate, a bunch of folks just got up in new peoples' faces and gave them no room to make faux pas.

I don't see that happening here. The crowd that's showed up over the last week or so has been made up of core Reddit folks, and the atmosphere is very Reddit in nature.

It's just the volume of content that is missing, and that already feels like it's inching toward critical mass and can become self-sustaining.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hmm. Unfortunate.

I think that just means we need moar bodies.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly, I just don't get twitter and never joined. I also don't super get mastadon. I see people talking about having great conversations, but it seems like the WORST interface for that (fedilab on android anyway). It's a good "rss aggregator" with comments, but the 500 character limit is still tiny for most comments I'd ever want to make, and the threading / comments are quite limited. At least on lemmy, if there's a post people are replying to - you can see the replies, you're not linked randomly half way through a thread, and you can type a longer comment. I just think I'm way more reddit acclimated, and actually I "grew up" with Slashdot so...

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] tookmyname@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People go to twitter to see what famous people and influencers have to say.

[–] gnoop@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People to go Reddit for the consolidated forums while also being able to browse a bunch of other entertainment and memes all in one shot. Or at least I do. The breadth of offerings of Reddit is a selling point.

[–] balderdash9@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

reddit has so many users that basically all interests are covered. I can look up an discussion thread on relatively obscure anime/manga that came out 8 years ago. That's hard to compete with and why I won't be quitting reddit entirely.

[–] gnoop@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yup, I've ended up having better luck searching for a product with "site:reddit.com" as well. It's also been the home for memes for quite some time. Even when I don't feel like delving into discussions on things, it's still the best / easiest place to scroll silly pictures and laugh for a bit when I'm lifting at the gym and between sets.

I won't be quitting though I'll be trying to dwindle my use a bit. I'm not much of a doom scroller but I will run through a list of subreddits on a regular basis.

[–] naoseiquemsou@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

People would only migrate from Twitter if a lot of famous people migtated first.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

I think this is it. On Lemmy and some of Reddit it doesn't matter who you are, as long as you behave yourself and bring thoughtful discussion with you. Twitter was more about following tweets from famous people groups, and finding people that outwardly display doing interesting things, so they would want more famous people to increase adoption.

yeah this is a bit different. It depends on where the best conversation is. I think we'll see a pretty large boom over the next few weeks, then a pretty solid decline, but if the devs are smart about it, some solid steady growth from there.

Over time we should be angling for "Oh yeah, I forgot I had an account over there, maybe I should check it out" as people see more and more links

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

July 1st is when all the 3rd party apps will start dying. There will probably be an influx of people who weren't paying much attention or were hoping that nothing would really happen that suddenly start looking for an alternative when it affects them directly.

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Its also possible that Reddit rows back from the API change (at least temporarily). I hope they do, so that we have a bit more time to get Lemmy ready.

[–] CheshireSnake@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

On one hand, I think this is the best opportunity for lemmy to grow exponentially in terms of reddit immigrants. It would be great to take advantage of this since if many users from reddit have a good experience with lemmy it's free word of mouth advertising over at reddit. Plus I'm not sure reddit will do something like this again in the foreseeable future after their IPO comes out.

On the other hand, I completely understand that there are technical challenges that need to be addressed, and a user that's trying lemmy out for the first time would probably get turned off if it seems like lenny is unstable and/or there's not much content to engage him/her.

Id love for lenny to evolve and grow. I've only been here ~48 hours but I'm already less stressed and the community so far has been good to me. I'll still promote lenny even after this API issue until they ban me. Lol.

[–] Nyanix@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

That makes me think about how folks left Twitter for Mastodon in waves due to several screw-ups, I hope that the migrations to Lemmy can be spaced enough that we can retain the user base.

[–] yozul@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I imagine potentially getting a couple extra zeros in the userbase of a still relatively small project in the space of like a month is more than just a little overwhelming. I hope reddit does at least allow more time for the API changes for a whole bunch of reasons, but I'm afraid they might really be planning on killing off third party apps before their IPO later this year.