this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
46 points (92.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43656 readers
1448 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Pearl Jam's cover of "Last Kiss" can fuck off forever. Turned me off the band for a solid decade.

I despise The Macarena in ways I cannot put into words.

As general commercial acts... probably Tad? They were a proto-grunge band that did nothing interesting and vanished once Nirvana took off. They tried being 'heavier than God's balls' and utterly whiffed at out-heavy-ing the then-struggling thrash-metal market. Honestly, not even Slayer thought they could top Reign In Blood, and it wasn't until 1994's apparently fantastic heroin glut that albums like Jar Of Flies and When The Kite String Pops started really challenging the limits of chugga-chugga music. Destroy Erase Improve reset the scoreboard in '95, but nobody noticed until years later.

[–] Viper_NZ 1 points 2 months ago

I didn’t care for Last Kiss, but I did like that they released it for charity and made $10 million for Kosovo refugees.

[–] Phenomephrene@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is an interesting analysis. 'Heavy' is a nebulous enough concept in music that being so definite with assertions like this is basically inviting contention. It can only ever really be a discussion as opposed to anything concretely absolute.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... as opposed to the objective "worst" in the root question?

[–] Phenomephrene@thebrainbin.org 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's fine.

I'm just saying there was plenty going on between '86 and '94 to challenge the limits of chugga-chugga as you put it. And I won't argue against Destroy Erase Improve being a watershed album, and I'd even consider it a respectable stance if you want to say it might be the heaviest record ever if that's your opinion, but it's not like it's an unquestionable monolith that no other records from around or before then could stand up to.