this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
515 points (98.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7228 readers
168 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TerryMathews@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, but take the converse: if they didn't own land, they definitely couldn't afford a slave.

[โ€“] sadreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

also true... wiki will explain it better: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_and_sufficiency

owning a plantation is necessary to be a slaver but it is not sufficient since you actually have to own the slaves.