this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
142 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17970 readers
50 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

GIMP 3.0 has been more than one decade in the making as the port from GTK2 to GTK3, also transitioning away from Python 2 to Python 3 support, and a wealth of other improvements from the UI to lower down into enhancing this open-source Photoshop alternative.

The GIMP project announced on X/Twitter today that they have entered the string freeze for this much anticipated release.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 16 points 3 months ago (7 children)

That's great! Now if only they'd stop thinking disability is funny, they might have a program worth using!

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've heard the term used reffering the fetish about 3000x more than I've heard it used referring to a disability

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Even if that's the case, that still makes it an immature name for what should be a serious project, because I doubt they've ever seriously engaged with the concept outside of them naming their project that, hey that's an idea!

Like, I don't mind fun. But as someone into kink too, the name of a project shouldn't invoke anything to do with either ableism or BDSM, especially since kink is not understood by most people correctly, unless a project is related to kink in some way, or ableism (which I'm going to seriously be suspicious of your project and motivations unless you're disabled and are reclaiming it) it's still a very bad name that doesn't really explain anything about it at a glance/first hearing it.

[–] StormRater@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Should WINE change its name since it can invoke imagery of debauchery and alcoholism? Or are we going to leave that one out of this idea of sanitizing names.

[–] iamhazel@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

I don't fly on planes because the automatic voice system on the cockpit says "retard"

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some people are so addicted to anger that they'll shoot themselves in the foot just so they'll have something to complain about.

"The gimp" is a character from Pulp Fiction. You're imagining things and refusing to use a powerful tool in response to that imagined slight.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 12 points 3 months ago

Nobody was angry. Also, words have multiple uses. Just because it was used in Pulp Fiction in the BDSM context does not mean it doesn't carry the ableist definition.

[–] xoggy@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What are you trying to prove here? They were asked to change it because it's ableist and they said no because it's funny. Giving me a definition does not refute that.

[–] xoggy@programming.dev 67 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Do you have evidence of that? That's not what I saw: https://www.gimp.org/docs/userfaq.html#i-dont-like-the-name-gimp-will-you-change-it

I don’t like the name GIMP. Will you change it?

With all due respect, no. We’ve been using the name GIMP for more than 20 years and it’s widely known. The name was originally (and remains) an acronym; although the word “gimp” can be used offensively in some cultures, that is not our intent. On top of that, we feel that in the long run, sterilization of language will do more harm than good. GIMP has been quite popular for a long time in search engine results compared to the use of the word “gimp”. So we think we are on the right track to make a positive change and make “gimp” something people actually feel good about. Especially if we add all the features we’ve been meaning to implement and fix the user interface. Finally, if you still have strong feelings about the name “GIMP”, you should feel free to promote the use of the long form GNU Image Manipulation Program or exercise your software freedom to fork and rebrand GIMP.

[–] Chewt@beehaw.org 54 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This seems like a good official message to have, and personally I think they are making the right call. As someone in my early 20s, I can say that at least in the area I grew up (pacific north west of USA) “gimp” as a derogatory term is not widely used or known among my peers. In fact it didn’t even occur to me that I knew a second usage for the word until I read a comment on reddit a few years ago. My response then was “Oh yeah I guess I’ve heard that word used in that way before, maybe in a movie?”, and to be honest I feel the same way now. I believe “gimp is on its way out as a term to put down others, and I’m much more familiar with the term GIMP in reference to the useful program that this post is about.

[–] xoggy@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

Most people here (who didn't grow up in the US 50+ years ago) wouldn't give negative connotations to the software's name. I'm on the side that it is well divorced of an ableist meaning but that's where the disagreement lies and some people are making a big fuss over.

Should we stop using words like taser and amok as well for having historically racist associations despite being divorces of those meaning? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Swift_and_His_Electric_Rifle

Our language is littered with more "land mines" that we realize if we want to make land mines out of them.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think they are leaving out the part where they called it "The GIMP" in the 90s. They clearly chose the name to be edgy, and they are now trying to justify it after the fact. Complaining about the "sterilization" of language is just out of touch and leaves out the fact that if they stopped using the word, it might just completely fall out of use.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The first public version of "The GIMP" was released in 1995.
Pulp fiction, with a character called "The Gimp" was released in 1994.
I'm pretty sure it's not ableist, just a movie reference.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 6 points 3 months ago

That is probably where they got it, but the word definitely had multiple uses at the time. It may not have been explicitly ableist, but it is and was an ableist word. It also invalidates their claim that they are trying to reclaim usage. Again, they named it that because they thought it was funny, not some grand scheme.

[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is just post-hoc justification, coupled with "PC culture is censorship" type of bullshit.

although the word “gimp” can be used offensively in some cultures, that is not our intent

Intent is irrelevant. In this case, if you didn't mean to offend, then you apologize and then change the fucking name. You don't get to say "sorry you were offended, but I don't care" and still expect people to take you seriously. Change "gimp" in that sentence to any other slur and try to make that same kind of justification.

I does not matter if the name was

  • based on a Pulp Fiction character because the devs thought it was funny
  • was a genuine reference to kink culture
  • an abelist slur

Who tf thinks a piece of software should be named after any of that? It's 1) offensive 2) wildly unprofessional and 3) a massive barrier to adoption.

The devs have the mentality of "edgy" 14 yo teen boys, have refused to ever grow the fuck up, and just throw tantrums whenever anyone tries to have a rational conversation with them about it

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's too bad that GLIMPSE fork never took off.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah. It could have done if some not very nice people hadn't have attacked them constantly just because they didn't like what they were trying to do.

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, was thinking it be quite a cool move to rename it to something nice with the big 3.0 release ...

Welp, Krita does everything I need (and more) so I'll keep using that.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That would have been a good idea, but alas they think they have good reasons for not doing so. Which, they don't as their argument isn't really sound, but people have their strongly held convictions even if they're incorrect especially when it comes to foss projects, lol.

Glad you have something else good to use!

[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 7 points 3 months ago

Even if their UI/UX weren't an atrocity that belongs at The Hague, the cruelty of their devs actively pushes me away from having any desire to give them another shot

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

green is my pepper 🫑