this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
1340 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

5274 readers
895 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Your entire house is ~~smart~~ hackable and tracks your every step for advertising revenue of big companies.

[–] lambda@programming.dev 31 points 2 months ago (3 children)

My smart home is Home Assistant hosted on a server in my house. It's fully open source and has gone through multiple paid audits to show its security is good too. The only non-local-only integrations are the weather api's and my thermostat (ecobee).

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I mean yeah, it's possible to set it up privacy-respecting and that's great. But the average tech enthusiast doesn't set up his own server beyound a NAS.

[–] lambda@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

A NAS is the perfect device to host it on though. Docker or VM.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Heh, I'd argue the average tech enthusiast is exactly the person that would set this up. If not them, then who is homeassistant for? I think modern tech enthusiasts are privacy conscious and will put in the small effort to enjoy that privacy. Its non-techies who wouldnt bother and just use the app it comes with.

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 3 points 2 months ago

A firejail doesn't hurt either ;)

[–] absGeekNZ 5 points 2 months ago

THIS

I work with tech; other than in my home office; there is no tech in my house.

The voice activated things.....just no. I looked into Mycroft, which looks interesting, but is till a solution looking for a problem.