this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
204 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37748 readers
165 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I first saw this on reddit, but I figured it would be good to make sure that this also stays accessible on another platform

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OrthoStice@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But wasn't Eraser supposed to wear out the SSD without noticeable improvements regards data recovery capability due to the way SSDs work?

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Well, the issue is that it depends on how you set eraser. Just doing a delete on an SSD has the same issue with just doing a delete on an HDD at the OS level for the file recovery. But SSDs don't really have the same need to overwrite a lot of times. So you could set Eraser to overwrite once with zeros or random values to successfully "shred" a single file.