this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
154 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

34636 readers
407 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Slave labor is a system in which a person is bought sold and indentured to a master for a substantial duration, often life. Their labor is coerced as property of that master.

That is not how China produces cars. They use highly automated systems and paid workers like everywhere else. While Chinese workers are paid less due to the forces of unequal exchange (a system imposed by the US) and an export economy (a system usually imposed by the US but more of a 4D chess move by China to develop productive forces, with the US gladly taking the deal for exploitation), that is not really why the cars are so much cheaper. It is because China has highly concentrated industry and a much less financialized system.

Speaking about "fair" is amazing in this context. The US is simply trying to protect domestic monopsony industry and to damage Chinese industry. This is a jingoistic and corporate policy.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Were talking about labour laws in the EU, not the US

[–] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My not American wage has me with less and less buying power with each passing year.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you loose all your savings and fall into years of debt if you have to spend a week in the hospital?

[–] PixellatedDave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No but that's also not the point being made here lol

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its relevant. Having reduced buying power yet not risking loosing all of your buying power for the rest of your life is generally preferred.

Most people don't realize how terrible it is in the US. Lots of migrants to the US searching for better pay, but they don't realize how miserable life in the US is because most of their paycheck gets eaten by rent, transportation to work, healthcare, etc. And as soon as they manage to save anything, it all gets wiped out by a single hospital visit.

I don't think Hollywood (how most people lean about the US) does a good job conveying how most people live in poverty in the US, how miserable they are, and how many of us kill ourselves because of the conditions.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's true but the logic applies. The EU is part of the imperial core that eats from that trough and in turn supports its maintainer. It is simply following the US' lead.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Labor conditions in the EU are better than in the US and better than in China

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depends on which part of the EU you are in. There is a reason the poor of Poland move to places like the UK.

Though this is neither here nor there as the original allegation was slave labor, which is simply a lie.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, the US would absolutely be the place you'd go for factual information about their biggest geopolitical rival. 😂

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A US State Department "fact sheet" from 2021 that cites no sources. Amazing.

Anyways, Chinese companies make electric cars in modern factories with normal workers paid for their labor. Y'all are peddling in orientalist assumptions that only work on people that know nothing at all about the country aside from, say, US State Department single page propaganda pieces.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's valid. Better to cite Amnisty and HRW

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Neither of those are exactly quality organizations whose claims should be taken at face value, though Amnesty International has made no claims about slave labor and HRW doesn't itself have any statements about that so far as I can tell.

Though this is beside the point as, again, we are talking about EV manufacturing. Please do your best to not support the orientalist implications throughout this thread. If you would like to make a specific claim, go ahead and do so, but be ready to explain it with more than NGO or State Department name dropping.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Chattel slavery is different than indentured servitude. There is no ownership of the indentured servant, but they are forced to work against their will. This is the slavery found in Xinjiang, as well as the US penal system.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

I didn't mention chattel slavery or indentured servitude. There have been slave economies outside the American colonies / the United States.

There is no evidence of slavery in Xinjiang, though there is a network of propagandists tied to Adrian Zenz, the US State Department, and the Australian equivalent who make dubious claims.