this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
1865 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5527 readers
1630 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shouldn’t that patent have expired by now?

It's an evolving technology. We get new patents with every iteration.

A market where only one entity is allowed to build MRI machines, or license the tech to others to build, is not a free market.

If you spend a few years in Business School getting your MBA, you get an earful about how and why patent law exists. The core argument is that private investment is predicated on returns and we can't have nice things unless we have men with guns come for the property and freedom of anyone who "steals an idea".

But more practically, this shit is just a racket. Lots of lobbyist money changes hands to make sure the decks at the casino are properly stacked. Medical treatment is just another opportunity to apply leverage through debt to control other people.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 46 minutes ago

I understand the value of a patent system, but patents should expire.

Is there some reason why previous-generation technology, like the tech being used for MRIs in the 90s, can’t be used to manufacture more competitively-priced machines?

Like, is there a law specifying that the new technology must be used for an MRI to be usable as a diagnostic tool?