this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
119 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37800 readers
101 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
119
Don’t believe the hype: AGI is far from inevitable (www.ru.nl)
submitted 2 months ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@beehaw.org
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20858435

Will AI soon surpass the human brain? If you ask employees at OpenAI, Google DeepMind and other large tech companies, it is inevitable. However, researchers at Radboud University and other institutes show new proof that those claims are overblown and unlikely to ever come to fruition. Their findings are published in Computational Brain & Behavior today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You literally were LMAO

Other than that, we will keep incrementally improving our technology and it's only a matter of time untill we get there. May take 5 years, 50 or 500 but it seems pretty inevitable to me.

Literally a direct quote. In what world is this not talking about LLMs?

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There's not a single mention of LLM's in my entire post. The argument I'm making there isn't even mine. I heard it from Sam Harris way before LLMs were even a thing.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, suuuuure you weren't.

Note that the proof also generalizes to any form of creating an AI by training it on a dataset, not just LLMs. But sure, we'll absolutely develop an entirely new approach to cognitive science in a few years, we're definitely not boiling the planet and funneling enough money to end world poverty several times over into a scientific dead end!

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

There's not a single mention of LLMs in my post. Not one.