this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

Australian News

556 readers
50 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's more expensive to become a republic at this point. Australia would need a referendum to change the Constitution. The last referendum attempt to become a republic was in 1999 and failed, but cost $66m.

The last referundum in Australia was last year and while the AEC has not fully costed it, I've seen one estimate of it costing $450m.

[–] Joshi@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't care what it costs. The idea that one person has the right to rule over others is offensive whether it is symbolic or not.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

As far as offensiveness, for me it's about the same whether it's one person or a hundred 'representatives'. In either case they're all completely alienated from me and what decisions would actually help us.

But on a pragmatic level, we've seen what happened to Gough Whitlam so we know this isn't merely a symbolic monarchist structure. It has a real impact.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 month ago

$66m is absolutely nothing in terms of the state.