this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
709 points (98.9% liked)

196

16407 readers
1935 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Literary or literally? (hint: neither are correct.)

[–] switchboard_pete@fedia.io 62 points 1 week ago

literally is objectively correct in this context

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] syreus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In the secondary, new-age definition of "literally" yes that's true.

We lost the war for "literally". It's now just an emphasis word. The definition is mind bending:

1)in a literal manner or sense; exactly.

2)informal; used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true.

On the bright side less people use "absolutely" incorrectly than before.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but where in the image do you see someone acknowledge the existence of Threads?