this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
396 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59631 readers
2616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Original Link.

More info.

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit's filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had "been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions". The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing "false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency's reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill".

On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site". In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Article is specifically about India

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This article is specifically about India, going All Lives Matter just seems strange here.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Feels like that's kind of most of them right now.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago

Doesn’t it though? A relative handful of people just fucking shit up for everyone on earth.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This right here. Let's not single out India, there's a lot of shitheel governments to go around.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 28 points 1 month ago

The article is about India.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago

It's the country named in the article lmao

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 4 weeks ago

Which other countries were subjects of the article?

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi modi