this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
2103 points (95.1% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3441 readers
417 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Because you now did it to yourself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know what your argument is any more. Sinema and Manchin were always moderates. Democrats can't perform miracles if they don't have enough votes. Do you have any suggestions how they could have done it with just a slim majority held back by two moderates? What's your plan? I'm listening.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m listening.

This entire conversation has shown that this is a lie.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So... Now we've pivotted to ad homs

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

No, I'm telling you that it's clear that you aren't listening and have no intention of listening. Talking to someone who makes endless excuses for democrats' deliberate failures is exhausting. I'm going to do something else.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't understand. Did I lobby any insults at you at any point?

I just asked how could any meaningful legislation pass without a super majority and you accuse me of lying. My thesis hasn't changed since post #1. Do you have any suggestions for how the democratic party could have effected change without a super majority? I'm really curious. We'd all like to know.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I just asked how could any meaningful legislation pass without a super majority and you accuse me of lying.

We gave Democrats the 50 seats they needed to kill the filibuster forever.

I said you were lying about listening. Because you weren't listening.