this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
1029 points (91.3% liked)

Political Memes

5479 readers
2642 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

If you look at the voters who voted for the dem in 2020 and sat out this time it was almost all older white men

Older white men were the demographic that stayed home because they didn't want to vote for a woman who had identical policies to the man they previously voted for.

Pretending like white men sat out exclusively because of "inflation" while no other demographic did is probably not the takeaway

That being said we absolutely need to kill the Duopoly, hopefully a third progressive party can exist with the Dems sucking corporate cock

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I keep telling myself I won't comment on political posts, and yet here I go again.

If we stop looking at non-voters, and start actually looking at voters, you'll see that Trump gained support among both women and non-white voters. Why is nobody asking about that? I would rather they have stayed home than given Trump the extra vote, but all you hear about now is low turn out in white men. She lost in almost every bloc because she didn't inspire any of the dem base. High turnout skews dem and she was just not an inspiring candidate.

Kamala had no time to campaign, was an unknown to voters despite being the VP, made no strides to distance herself from Biden, and failed to run a cohesive strategy. People just were not excited to vote for her. Do I think a popularity contest is the best way to elect the president, no, but that doesn't change the system that we have.

The race was extremely close, and the fact that Trump GAINED in POC and women blocs probably speaks more to the campaign that was run rather than America's inherent sexism or racism. Just to be clear, America is sexist and racist, and people can be self hating or whatever, but she GAINED points in the white male category and lost in the black male category. Sure, white men should have shown up, but it's very easy to cry "racism/sexism" if you ignore all the other people who didn't show up or the people who DID show up and voted trump. She might've run as well as she could have, but it was a bad campaign.

There was a 5% loss in young voters. I wonder how energized they would have been not just to vote but to donate and volunteer had she run a different campaign. It's easy to Monday morning quarterback, but Joe ruined the chances of a dem winning this year.

If dems still want to blame racism/sexism, then I don't want to see any dems support POC/women in primaries. Dems should only run white males and if I see a POC/woman being pushed again I will assume they want to sabotage that year. I expect "I'm not voting for a POC/woman candidate" to be a well regarded and widespread dem opinion for practicality sake. Either stop running them ever, or admit they can win with better campaign strategies. You can't have it both ways.

Going off these numbers: https://www.nbcwashington.com/decision-2024/2024-voter-turnout-election-demographics-trump-harris/3762138/

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There was also a significant portion of black men who voted Trump because they were misogynists. It's just a fact.

But that's still not discounting the fact that someone with Bernie's message and goals would have won in a landslide.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

I can't speak to the misogyny, but to your second point, I try so hard to not mention him because your opinion gets disregarded in dem spaces as soon as you bring him up. He did everything right and dems would rather lose than actually be progressive.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you look at the voters who voted for the dem in 2020 and sat out this time it was almost all older white men

Jill Stein won 22% of the vote in the fiercely contested city of Dearborn, Michigan, according to a projection from NBC.

Kamala Harris won 28%, while Donald Trump won 47%, according to unofficial results from the city clerk, reported by the network.

Metro Detroit is home to the nation's largest concentration of Arab Americans, with a large proportion of them living in Dearborn. The city—which Democrat Joe Biden won by a 3-to-1 margin in 2020—has been roiled by political turmoil, with many upset with the Biden-Harris administration's handling of the Israel-Hamas war.

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Third party canidates did not receive enough votes to sway anything this election.

If every third party voter voted dem nothing would be different

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Third party canidates did not receive enough votes to sway anything this election.

The biggest spike was in non-voters. Around 16M - overwhelmingly Dems - stayed home between 2020 and 2024.

Dems were successful in scaring voters off the Green Party. Greens got 1.4M voters in 2016 and a mere 636k voters in 2024.

But that was just a tiny slice of the overall atrophy of progressive support.

Socialism or Barbarism... We're making a choice

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you look at the voters who voted for the dem in 2020 and sat out this time it was almost all older white men

Sorry, can I have a source for this? How could they determine the gender of non-voters?

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who you voted for is secret but that you voted is public information. I haven't heard if it was predominantly white men who sat it out, but that wouldn't be hard data to gather.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve been searching, and can only find that non-voters are racially diverse.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Older white man here. I stayed home because of Gaza. I have 3 progressive friends who say the exact same thing. None of us are Muslim, and we're all white and older.
By the way:

Democrats had bet on women showing up in force. They didn’t https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3e8z53qyd5o

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well all the Palestinians are dead for sure now

Good job idiot

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I disagree with your sides talking point that Biden and Harris were doing anything for Palestinians or were about to. And Harris could have stopped the weapons shipments in the last few days of the election and gotten the progressive votes she needed. She opted not to and chose defeat.

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whatever you need to tell yourself.

They're all dead now

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Its this sort of fantasy nonsense that lost the election. It obviously doesnt work, and you should stop.