Linuxsucks

185 readers

78 users here now

Rules:

FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic.
No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

madthumbs@lemmy.world

-25

It's the users, not the architecture (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by madthumbs@lemmy.world to c/linuxsucks@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I mentioned Krita, lol, and even if I hadn't there's no reason to assume GIMP, the most unintuitive piece of software to grace our desktops.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Krita is not a good photo editor. It's missing a ton of photo editing features compared to GIMP or Photoshop. The target demographic is digital painters.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I guess I mostly edit my photos with AI, so Krita is sufficient for my needs, but I take your point.

[–] USSMojave@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

Gimp is fine

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

Krita is an art / painting program. -Not designed for photo editing. It's also from KDE so expected to be buggy: https://www.qwant.com/?q=krita+buggy&t=web

Some of us just want to get work done instead of tolerate and trouble shoot *admittedly buggy foss software.