902

Honestly call or email the Democratic party offices and voice that you one hundred percent agree with Sanders.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately his whole political career has been the democrats telling him he’s wrong as they continually shoot themselves in their collective dick.

I, for one, will be writing in his name, voting third party or not at all until they give me a genuinely progressive candidate. Until then, fuck them, and fuck this country.

[-] TeenieBopper@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

One of the biggest things about being a leftist is being right about stuff before it's considered polite.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's like being Cassandra, the Greek seer who can see the future but is cursed to forever be not believed.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago

What is needed is a socialist organization of voters who together have enough voting power to make our break a Democratic representatives career.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

What is needed is a socialist organization of voters who together have enough voting power to make our break a Democratic representatives career.

Yes. But it can be any group of voters. Could be a 'tea party on the left'.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Aren't organization and group synonymous?

And of course, this is assuming that Trump isn't going to establish himself as a dictator. Of course, the thing is Trump is too old to be dictator. And the people around him don't seem to be the most competent, either. So I sort of don't know what's going to happen. In any case, I'm glad that I don't live in the US, thought authoritarianism is advancing globally.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If Trump is going to establish himself as a dictator, then this kind of group is even more important. Lots of socialist groups have toppled totalitarian leaders, and when they haven't, it's usually because of western countries like the US helping the dictator. Of course, it might have to run underground a bit more, but solidarity between various organizations will be extremely important in the upcoming 4 years.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Well, you're right, but then the group's tactics would need to be fundamentally different.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

progressives are already 8% of voters. We can make or break elections now.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Having the numbers isn't enough, there needs to be organization. A group of 8% of the electorate that votes in lockstep could affect policy pretty fundamentally, more than any amount of money could.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

And progressive policies are supported by supermajorities of both democrat and republican voters…. Oh well

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Now, imagine this sentiment among thousands of people, across multiple states. That’s how you lose an election.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

Lmao buddy. Ignoring the people to the left is how you literally just lost an election

[-] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 2 years ago

That is exactly what they just said.

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Sorry, but losing strategies deserve to lose. Im tired of voting for someone because they’re slightly less bought and paid for.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The best reason to vote for Harris was because she was going to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations like Biden did also. Why would you NOT do that?

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 2 years ago

If two partys are not representing my interests at all, the winning strategy is to make my vote about punishing the one that didnt represent my interests when it was in power. This way it will have to adapt to recognize my interests when it needs my vote to get back to power.

By just always voting whatever party claims to be the less evil for me, all i do is create a race to the bottom of evil, as i make sure that my vote does not need to be fought for.

[-] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 years ago

These people are all whooshing hard on what you said. They can't even imagine non-scold comments anymore.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It’s okay. We’re all frustrated.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
902 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31286 readers
2155 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS