this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
348 points (96.5% liked)

World News

39067 readers
2798 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The measure received 14 votes in favour, with the US the sole member to reject it. However, because the US is a permanent member of the council, it has the ability to veto any resolution brought forward

Unlike several previous resolutions regarding a ceasefire in Gaza, Wednesday's measure was brought forward by all 10 elected members of the Security Council.

The US has vetoed four previous attempts at calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, on most occasions being the lone vote against the measures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 22 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

As long as you keep voting limb cutters, they have no motivation to stop cutting limbs. Not voting for limb cutters is the only way to make non limb cutting get on the ballot

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

"I would only have the time to save 2 of the 4 childrens in the burning house so I might as well not save any of the children."

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Now imagine next election one person is threatening to kill 4 children and the other team 6. Well obviously we should save 4! Then next election, we have to kill 6, so we don't vote for the person killing 8. And so on. That's how we got in this predicament.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The people who want to kill 0 children literally do not show up to primaries.

That's how we get candidates that want to kill 2 children in every election.

[–] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

harris had never gotten even thousand votes in the primaries where 10 million people vote. she only got to become vp by sucking up to superpacs who didn’t want a progressive like warren as vp

and since 2016 dnc uses primaries more for just pissing on its members.

the problem is not the voters but dnc which today is run by lobbyists.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 20 hours ago

That is a valid position if you intend to use that time to make it so that children don't need to burn every election.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee -4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

"Two limbs is just as bad as 4 limbs, so I choose 4 limbs!"

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Not for nothing, but where is this two limb option? All I see is four limb options except one is grinning and clapping the other is just wearing a false look of commiseration.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You do realize that there is more than one election? Like every four years there is an election. Treating every election like it is the only one and never looking past the immediate effects for the next year is what brought this mess in the first place.

This is also why this comparison is bad. You can not only loose at this election, but the next one and the one after that amd the one after that. In fact one could argue Americans have been loosong every election to the neoliberals since a few decades. And why? Because you never made a point of getting one party to stop being neoliberals.

[–] rknx@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This election made me realize that political affiliation in the states for a lot of people is like being in a cult. Rather than accepting that your side has issues and needs a change, people just try to justify it by pointing how bad the other side can be worse. Like 90% of lemmy democrats don't get that I'm not motivated to vote for being waist-deep in shit vs chest-deep in shit. Yes, one is worse than another, but I prefer to vote so I don't have to be in shit at all. But all they will say back is hurr durr trump bad.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

I feel like we need to normalize that demanding more from representatives is OK and necessary for a functioning democracy. The party needs to respond to the demands of those they are supposed to represent. This election made it clear that they only care about the demands of the donors and that needs to change