this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
306 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39067 readers
2581 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The measure received 14 votes in favour, with the US the sole member to reject it. However, because the US is a permanent member of the council, it has the ability to veto any resolution brought forward

Unlike several previous resolutions regarding a ceasefire in Gaza, Wednesday's measure was brought forward by all 10 elected members of the Security Council.

The US has vetoed four previous attempts at calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, on most occasions being the lone vote against the measures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"I would only have the time to save 2 of the 4 childrens in the burning house so I might as well not save any of the children."

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Now imagine next election one person is threatening to kill 4 children and the other team 6. Well obviously we should save 4! Then next election, we have to kill 6, so we don't vote for the person killing 8. And so on. That's how we got in this predicament.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The people who want to kill 0 children literally do not show up to primaries.

That's how we get candidates that want to kill 2 children in every election.

[–] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

harris had never gotten even thousand votes in the primaries where 10 million people vote. she only got to become vp by sucking up to superpacs who didn’t want a progressive like warren as vp

and since 2016 dnc uses primaries more for just pissing on its members.

the problem is not the voters but dnc which today is run by lobbyists.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 16 hours ago

That is a valid position if you intend to use that time to make it so that children don't need to burn every election.