Politics

10178 readers

134 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

the moratorium on US presidential election posts has ended; you are now free to post about the subject again (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 day ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

sufficient time has passed for takes on this subject to actually be informed by more than snap judgements, ideological impulses, and ill-advised guesstimates. also, virtually all votes have now been counted. if you'd like to post about your theories of what went wrong and why, you should now have the data to argue it without things just being a total clusterfuck. thank you for your compliance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dragonfucker 9 points 21 hours ago

Kamala ran a weak campaign. She shouldn't have bragged about expanding oil production and she shouldn't have supported fracking.

But she was making home ownership easier with her first home subsidy, which reduces demand for rentals and reduces rents. And her government invested a billion dollars into renewables.

People refused to vote for Harris, because they said Harris wouldn't fundamentally change anything. Harris's campaign slogan was "we can't go back", but voters didn't believe her. They wanted change.

Donald Trump promised change and he got the votes.

The non voters who said they wanted change got what they asked for. Now they live in a fascist dictatorship.

Some people think blame is a limited resource. It's not. Three groups are to blame for the election result:

The DNC including Harris who didn't change enough.
The people who voted for Trump or who didn't vote at all because they wanted change.
The people who voted for Harris, but spent all their free time spreading anti-Harris propaganda. Words have consequences. The non-voters didn't decide Harris was bad on their own. Somebody told them so.