this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
414 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39211 readers
2129 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

can't they have a no-confidence vote?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He’s using the military to block legislators from making any vote to end this

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's honestly insane that these sorts of technicalities are even possible to block the vote. "I called dictatorshipsies and you weren't in the parliament building when you clearly, overwhelmingly said 'no', so I guess no takesies backsies." There probably ought to be some sort of provision in Korean law going forward that if it isn't possible to enter the parliament building, they can hold the vote elsewhere.

Edit: they have convened elsewhere.

Edit 2: unanimous vote to end martial law, 190–0.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 21 points 1 day ago

Worth noting is that the unanimous vote includes members of the president's party (as far as I can see from skimming headlines. They're dropping fast...)

Yonhap news agency cited the military as saying activities by parliament and political parties would be banned, and that media and publishers would be under the control of the martial law command.

i see now, article was updated

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yoon cited a motion by the country's opposition Democratic Party, which has a majority in parliament

hol up, just how this happens

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago

The president and the government seems to have a longer mandate than the individual representatives.

They lost the last election, hard, so this is a lame duck government.

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's president, not prime minister. Removing him would require an impeachment, which usually has a higher barrier then a no confidence vote, though I'm not familiar with Korean government.

ok but PPP with 108 seats out of 300 somehow forms government, and not DPK with 170