World News

22095 readers

76 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

117

United Healthcare CEO Fatally Shot in New York (apnews.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by MutatedBass@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I figured this is the correct community to post to since UHC is a multi-national company but if this is more suited to US News I can move it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 63 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

finally, some good fucking news

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I would normally be upset about something like this happening, and would never advocate for it. But then I think about how many lives this person is indirectly responsible for ruining and I feel less bad lol

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

At what point does indirectly become directly? I think what's most important here is intent - this man was clearly knowledgeable enough to know he was causing harm and still chose to do so in order to increase shareholder profit. There is malice here no matter how you slice it.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Indirectly or directly doing it, they still had the same intentions either way (like you mentioned). Neither is anymore excusable than the other. One is just more legal.

[–] rtc@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

If a person refuses to see whether they are causing harm even unintentionally… refuses to even try… that's all that matters. Responsibility lies there when the person causes harm. Same for persons who are aware and are personally fine with causing harm for gain. On the other hand, seeing and personally trying to reduce it, a person can atone for harm caused by oneself. These things cannot be forced. Attempts to be fully aware and not cause harm only brings happiness to the one making such attempts in the end. The 'pains of life', which is the purpose for the concept of 'escapes' to exist in the first place, go away completely. You could call such pains either the result of maliciousness or the naivety which aids people who want to cause harm.

This is a decision everyone can only make by themselves.

[–] aaron@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

lol deaths

[–] intresteph@discuss.online 19 points 2 weeks ago

I wish there was more of this kind of news

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Careful.

You might get banned for being happy.

See Lemmy.world news and the resulting powertripping mods post https://lemmy.zip/post/27427367

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago

This community and the user you replied to aren’t on .world though?