137
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Valve is going for a console experience, and that means the games just work. Every time, no matter what, with no tinkering.

Obviously, with PC gaming (on Linux no less), that is a nearly insurmountable challenge.

I think the check mark is their attempt at that, and that's why it doesn't match 1:1 with ProtonDB.

Even the most minimal amount of "tinkering," or "incompatibility," like having to change the resolution the first time you open the game, or the game doesn't have an option for the Deck's resolution (meaning small black bars at the top and bottom. Big deal), will stop it from getting approved as "fully compatible"

Valve's approval is just not the same thing as ProtonDB, they have two different purposes

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago

Yes I understand how the Steam Deck and verified ratings work, but thanks for the explanation.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Well based on your comment, it seemed as thought you didn't.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 2 years ago
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I went to hit "edit" and accidentally deleted my comment. Lol derp.

What I said was:

The verification system is not remotely accurate. It probably does more harm than good. Valve should have made it crowdsourced like protondb because they’re obviously unable to keep up, and I don’t know why they thought they would be.

You are criticizing the verification system by comparing it to ProtonDB which, again, is a different thing.

Steam's verification isn't "inaccurate," it just denotes which games will give you the "console experience" right out of the box. And for that purpose, it does just fine. Crowdsourcing something like that would not be a good way for Valve to accomplish its goals.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago

You are criticizing the verification system by comparing it to ProtonDB which, again, is a different thing.

Different in some ways but serves the same purpose.

Steam's verification isn't "inaccurate,"

Yes it is.

Crowdsourcing something like that would not be a good way for Valve to accomplish its goals.

Yes it would.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't know what else you expect me to say.

If Steam declares a game is "unsupported" but it runs perfectly fine, I don't know what other way to describe that than "inaccurate".

Crowdsourcing is obviously far more effective if you simply look at the ratings on SteamDB.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
137 points (98.6% liked)

Steam Hardware

23302 readers
146 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Controller] - Steam Controller related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS