this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
847 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19273 readers
1924 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 82 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Just wish the US would get a universal healthcare system like every freaking other developed country in this world. Will never happen. Ugh.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah, the Republicans would rather see you spend twice as much per capita (the whole population!) to cover a third of the population via public insurance and then get you guys to then spend money on private insurance and then have to pay any time you need any care.

You know... Fiscal responsibility...

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

To be fair Kamala was also against Medicare for All

EDIT: Y'all need to learn to Google basic shit before rage downvoting facts you don't like: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-kamala-harris-ditched-medicare-for-all/

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the two parties. Republicans and Kamala.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Yes only the Republicans have a leader they listen to and built a platform on. Harris had no influence on her policy choices!

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe you weren't aware of this, but Kamala was the Democrat's nominee for president. Which is the highest office in the government.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you show me all the primary results to back up your claim?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 days ago

I don't think they do, judging by the downvotes.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

As was "nothing will fundamentaly change" Biden. Corporate whores to their very core.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Pretty sure she supports it, as she did 4 years ago, but her campaign told her not to show support for it in order to court the Republicans that were on the fence.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

but her campaign told her not to show support for it in order to court the Republicans that were on the fence.

Seems like they told her to do that with a lot of things.

womp womp.

I'm holding out hope that the Democrats decide to court Democrats, but based on the past few elections I don't have very high hopes.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Democrats: taking votes for granted that they shouldn't be taking for granted since forever.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

Correction: Taking intelligence and empathy for granted that they shouldn't be taking for granted, since basically social media started being a thing.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

If you don't support it during the campaign then you don't get to say you secretly supported it later.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So she's a spineless liar? That's worse.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They adopted a strategy, it didn't work.

Welcome to politics, you don't always defend what you believe in.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

So she's both a spineless liar and lacks substantive values? Voters who like that kind of candidate voted for Trump. Predictably. Welcome to politics.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ah, Jacobin. Of course. The ones who said housing the homeless is not good, because it means landlords will get paid.

Can't wait to read their thoughts on health care. Let me guess: "Universal health care now, but not if corporations benefit too".

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 days ago

They hated ACD for telling the truth.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wish granted. The government is now responsible for paying whatever premiums the health insurance companies demand. But everyone with a social security number is covered.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

There's a way of dealing with insurance company CEOs who aren't good people don't worry

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

It will happen, we just haven't fought hard enough for it yet.