this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
27 points (72.1% liked)

World News

34158 readers
733 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I only stated the truth.

For some reason, you don't like that.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think people should be arrested for writing dirty stories?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They were arrested for mass distribution, not for writing. Keep in mind this law was written before the internet, back then distributing 5000 copies was a fairly large operation. I don't think the writers of the law foresaw a future where distributing 5000 copies of a work could be done instantly and in many cases for free (although the punishment is more severe based on income)

I'm only clarifying the facts. My personal opinions on the matter are quite different.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think people should be arrested for writing an erotic fiction book?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, but I don't think posting misleading headlines in an English-speaking forum is the way to change that.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s not misleading. It’s just focusing on one aspect of a much larger problem. The article never said “only gay fiction.”

You seem to exist on both sides of this topic. It must be exhausting to be queer, and pro-china, since you’re definitely not welcome there.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The article clarifies, but you know people don't read articles. Posters read headlines and then go right to the comments section. All I was doing was taking the information in the article and posting it in the comments section.

And it's not like I'm fucking welcome in my own home lol

[–] fishabel@discuss.online -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But it’s not important to create an argument against something just because you dislike the title of the article. It just makes you sound like you’re in favor of locking them up.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's important for discussions to be based in reality and not a misleading title.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s not misleading. It’s just focused on a specific group, because that’s the publication. You’re asking a lot from “journalists” ;)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Even if you allow for the special focus it still implies China is targeting gay erotica, as opposed to gay erotica. Those are very different stories. Plus, this forum doesn't have a focus on any specific groups for which the publication's bias should be accounted.

And so that's what I did. I clarified what was missing in the title. That's all.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I do this for fun. Not everyone is a paid shill out to get you.

[–] fishabel@discuss.online 0 points 2 months ago

You sure don’t seem to be having fun on here