this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2023
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37646 readers
241 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve learned to make “machines that can mindlessly generate text. But we haven’t learned how to stop imagining the mind behind it.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My understanding is that we still do not have a great consensus on how our own brains operate - how we actually think.

How our brains operate and how we think are in ways two different things, but my understanding is that you're correct to a large extent. Then there's the whole question of what consciousness even is.

I was actually just reminded of a good article on consciousness, I'll post it in !science@beehaw.org in just a mo

edit: https://beehaw.org/post/448653

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At this point we're in philosophy rather than biology!

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

You can't get a theory of mind out of biology or neurology alone, you need philosophy to make sense of things and actually build a theory of why. See eg. cognition science

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, deep questions about things like minds often end up in philosophy.