this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
182 points (88.2% liked)

Technology

61263 readers
5880 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Confidentiality. Or porn. One of those things.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I just want to know when I can connect my noise-cancelling Bluetooth headphones to the display instead of the tinny pair of wired "maraccas" that I keep in my travel bag.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Idk, 150 people in a tin can all using Bluetooth could cause issues.

It would be better to get noise cancelling headphones with a 3.5mm headphone jack. I had some until my daughter broke them, and I loved them.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

If it could, planes would be dropping right and left. It hasn't been an issue in several decades

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Loads of people use Bluetooth devices on airplanes already. Are there any reports of destructive interference as is?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Idk. But from my experience, it's usually something like 20 people (me included). If you made that the default way to connect, I think more people would use them.

Or maybe it's not an issue, idk. I don't know a ton about Bluetooth and airplanes.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

I've been on budget flights where in flight infotainment was an app on your phone that connects to a media server on the plane itself. Everyone was using Bluetooth and there are no issues.

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would expect a plan to have a lot more than 20 people watching something on their phone with AirPods (or a clone thereof). Just about everyone that's watching or listening to something on their phone nowadays is using BT headphones, because most phones don't have 3.5mm jacks anymore.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Also consider smart watches.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The second we get a better short range wireless protocol so there aren't a hundred Bluetooth devices jamming each other on the plane.

If you travel a lot they do make airplane headphones that have a 3.5mm connector and run noise cancelling.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I've been on budget flights where the in-flight infotainment was an app on your phone which connects to a media server on the plane. Everyone was watching with Bluetooth headphones and there were no issues.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The budget airline handed out wireless headphones?

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

So... I'm pretty sure the entire plane wasn't on Bluetooth headphones then.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Number of stews who have the time to help you figure out the pairing rigamarole or why the radio on this unit is fucked: ZERO.

Number of issues with regular fucking headphones: zero.

Cases where the tinniness will impact your enjoyment of visual spooge: zero

People stopping you from buying some $15 apple 3.5mm pods for your earballs: zero

I'm thinking you'll be fine. Leave the air safety officers alone so they can do their job.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

3.5mm earphones don't block 85db of plane noise

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most over-ear noise cancelling headphones I've seen have a 3.5mm input that works with the noise cancelling.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Yet I haven't heard of an earphone with this functionality

[–] threshold_dweller@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What? My 20 years of flying regularly with 3.5mm headphones must have been a very long hallucination.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I said earphones and you're talking about headphones

[–] threshold_dweller@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

They make both.

edit: insult was unnecessary.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't found a single model of wired noise canceling earphones in existence

[–] threshold_dweller@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

And because you haven't found them, they must not exist?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

By earphones I mean in-ear models. Maybe there is some weird over-ear model with that feature, but when IEMs add the Bluetooth feature, the cord gets cut from the design

[–] threshold_dweller@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

Damn, you're right. For many years I used the Bose Quiet Comfort 20, but those aren't made anymore. There are still some options but none of them look great. The major brands just stopped making them. Ironically the first pair I found was USB-C with an adapter.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The ones that seal do provide sound isolation

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they're lots of fun when there's a cabin announcement.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't care about them, the seatbelt light is either on or off, don't bother me with what the temperature is at our destination

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't work that way. They're piped through all audio channels at maximum volume.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Don't care, gaming on my steam deck

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Number of stews who have the time to help you figure out the pairing rigamarole or why the radio on this unit is fucked: ZERO.

No help necessary. Leave it as an advanced option and provide those who request assistance a cheap pair of 3.5 mm headphones. SOLVED.

Number of issues with regular fucking headphones: zero.

  1. Wire gets caught in my limbs because the seating area is so tight.

  2. Wire jack is tucked up from people pulling headphones at odd angles. Wortsst case scenario (has happened to me): the jack is inoperable, incapable of holding headphones without continuous, upwards pressure.

  3. No active noise canceling (you might still be able to find ANC wired headphones but they are a niche product if they still exist).

  4. An extra item to pack, since my phone requires a dangle to use 3.5 mm headphones, so I either pack a dangle, or another pair of headphones for using with my phone.

Cases where the tinniness will impact your enjoyment of visual spooge: zero

I'm sorry you're not able to appreciate hifi sound but that's a a you problem.

People stopping you from buying some $15 apple 3.5mm pods for your earballs: zero

Those sound like shit compared to the expensive pair of wireless ear buds that I already own.

I’m thinking you’ll be fine. Leave the air safety officers alone so they can do their job.

Of course I'm fine. But what's this nonsense about bothering air safety officers? Nobody is berating airline employees about bluetooth headphones lol.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Found these pretty quickly.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

They make a thing for that.