this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
182 points (88.2% liked)

Technology

61263 readers
5638 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Confidentiality. Or porn. One of those things.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I worked in a wine shop that had banks of conputers that people could ise to look up reviewer’s rating on wines or place orders on our website. I ended up having to get IT to lock them down to only 6-7 websites because people would use them to try to access their banking. I had to explain to way too many people with jobs in high finance the risks of them doing this on a public computer. Too many idiots would do banking on a flight only to get robbed.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I watched a woman log into her email at a Best Buy laptop kiosk then walk away. I went over and logged her out.

The user is a moron. Lock your shit.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I spent two years at that aforementioned wine shop emailing “I love you” to my co-worker buddy Rob should anyone have left open their email. Rob knew it was me but always made a point to thank the person who said they loved him.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When I bought my house it took the old owner ages to reroute all of her mail to whatever her new address was. At one point sje had a credit card sent to her and it came to my house along with the PIN number.

If I'd been so inclined I could have withdrawn all the money from her account.

Meanwhile when I moved in I spent the first 2 days basically doing nothing other than making sure all of my mail was coming to my new address.

People are just really bad at thinking

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

Right? I keep a list of every single company/service that I gave my email address, physical address, or phone number to. Every time I give it out I add it to the list. When it needs changing I go through the list and update it in all of them.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The article is about extended displays though. No traces left.

And The last time I flew the displays had viewing angles tht made it so only you could see the display, sp they were actually more private than laptops.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've never seen angle protection on those screens and I've flown multiple carriers with them.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've definitely seen them in American airlines at least in the business class. That was about 2014 ish so I'd be surprised if it hasn't become anything other than more commonplace.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I think they went the other way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

No traces but you are still sharing your financials on a screen

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 107 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 17 hours ago

No darkmode... Pedestrian flash banging the plane

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Seriously. What a fucking ridiculous "problem". The photos in this article are absurd.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 70 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Carries entire homelab onto plane so who's up for a LAN party? I'm hosting.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You joke, but I have absolutely created an ad-hoc wireless network and gamed with people I'm traveling with on a flight before.

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I played splinter cell chaos theory coop with some random on my steamdeck on a transatlantic flight a few months ago. Can highly recommend!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm already annoyed when someone is using their phone in the dark and doesn't adjust the brightness settings.

If you do this during night flights, sincerely, fuck you.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago

My wife does this. At 2am. Often mid week. And wonders why I wake up in the middle of the night and grumpy.

[–] Shaggy1050@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How?! How can they stand it themselves and not feel like they're being blinded?

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

Probably just don't know what dark mode is

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're just not letting their eyes get dark-adapted in the first place. They can't see anything but the phone screen, but they also don't care.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As someone with their phone set to the bottom third of the brightness spectrum almost always (unless I'm outside), I really don't understand this. Brightness is perhaps my most adjusted setting, since I use it a half dozen times a day or so. In fact, brightness is the least interesting spec when looking at a device, since I rarely run at max anyway. In fact, my computer screen I use for work is usually at 50% brightness.

How can people stand getting blasted with lumens all the time?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As someone who finds that most "dark mode" offerings aren't dark enough, I don't understand how they can tolerate it either. I suspect it's rather like spicy food: given enough exposure, you don't notice it's spicy (or bright) until reaching a level far above what people who aren't exposed to it on a constant basis would think was acceptable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 49 points 2 days ago (8 children)

If it’s wireless someone will be sent porn by the creep 2 rows back.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

yeah this whole article was an unnecessary rant which the author realized only after publishing.

Update: A reader writes in with an obvious comment that did not occur to me:

The obvious reason not to let people put things on the screens you own in public is that invariably people will put porn on them, and then you'll have other people complaining that the united screen system is showing porn. They don't say this because no corporate PR hack is going to talk about porn when it's not necessary. But it's definitely the real reason, and it's one they will not and should not budge on.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Reason is a shit rag, and I don't think their slop should be posted.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think they're one of the better ones since they tend to cite their sources clearly. Media bias fact check agrees with me as well.

They are super biased though, and you'll get something between a libertarian and Republican lite perspective (think socially liberal Republicans). They absolutely shouldn't be your only source of news and they're very selective about what they cover, but when it comes to factual accuracy, they're pretty good.

Perhaps you disagree with their political bias, but that doesn't make them inaccurate. I highly recommend reading some high quality news sources with a different political bias than your own to get a broader perspective. It doesn't have to be Reason, but Reason is a decent option for left-leaning people because the factual accuracy is pretty high and the perspective is so different.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago
[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (21 children)

I just want to know when I can connect my noise-cancelling Bluetooth headphones to the display instead of the tinny pair of wired "maraccas" that I keep in my travel bag.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Idk, 150 people in a tin can all using Bluetooth could cause issues.

It would be better to get noise cancelling headphones with a 3.5mm headphone jack. I had some until my daughter broke them, and I loved them.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

If it could, planes would be dropping right and left. It hasn't been an issue in several decades

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The second we get a better short range wireless protocol so there aren't a hundred Bluetooth devices jamming each other on the plane.

If you travel a lot they do make airplane headphones that have a 3.5mm connector and run noise cancelling.

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I've been on budget flights where the in-flight infotainment was an app on your phone which connects to a media server on the plane. Everyone was watching with Bluetooth headphones and there were no issues.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The budget airline handed out wireless headphones?

[–] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

So... I'm pretty sure the entire plane wasn't on Bluetooth headphones then.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›