269
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

If there ever was a time to criticize the democrats, it is 3 months AFTER an election.

If there ever was a time to not to criticize the democrats, it is 3 months BEFORE an election.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If there was ever a time for the DNC to listen to voters, it was at any point in time.

Do not hold back on them, hold them accountable and demand better. “We will apply pressure but back off when it’s actually meaningful” is a terrible strategy.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

They cannot hope to gain the support of voters unless they make it clear they are interested in their voters.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Whether they actually are good for us and are actually fighting for us or not, constant smear campaign fueled by wealthy bad actors and foreign powers is going to have impacts on the vote.

Sometimes we need to fight back against bias by evening out that scale, declaring the value in voting blue no matter who.

Even if we think Democrats might shit the bed, we need to make it clear we have to prevent Republicans from pumping gallons of shit into the bedroom.

This group of progressives, "Our Revolution" was a continuation of the Bernie Sanders election campaign, and Bernie Sanders spent today yelling at the top of his lungs as the US confirmed a health secretary who actively promoted the unnecessary death of infants and argued with him on pharmaceutical company profits.

Voter Outreach and party platform is OUR JOB. Not just the DNC.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Who's the one running the primaries, collecting donations and buying ad space?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Who are the ones voting in primaries, donating, and volunteering?

Bernie Sanders was in the 2016 and 2020 primaries and lost by an absolutely huge margin both times. The organization isn't the problem. How the people are voting is. Even if you "fix" the DNC it won't fix the problem.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They didn't even bother to run primaries for this last election even though they had to know that Biden wasn't going to run. They gambled on wasting the RNC's efforts running an anti-Biden campaign when they were going to swap Harris in and lost.

They also turned out the lights on anti-war Sanders supporters, so forgive me if I don't think the DNC plays fair. The US is going to collapse and I can't say we don't deserve it.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's basically how incumbent presidents have worked for 248 years. That's not news. Biden obtained 14,465,519 out of 16,610,102 votes in the 2024 primary election, 87.09% and obtained 3,894 delegates while the runner up received 35.

He had every right to pass his chance on to his VP and I thank him for it, it was a valiant effort and took a lot of courage I'm sure.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

So much courage to wait until the last minute. We should have primaries for every incumbent.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

So you’re saying we should lie about the loser democrats?

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Can you really say that you're against christofascist oligopoly when thats the words you have to say about the only opposition?

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

I can say I am against the DNC and that they are going to lose their leadership whether they like it or not. There’s a new generation of Dems and the Dems will die and there’ll be a new party or they will accept the policies that supermajorities of Dems and republicans support and kick their loser ass leadership who only knows how to get donors money and lose elections

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There is not always a new party. In the past, new parties came from branching old parties.

One party systems exist and that is the path the USA is currently on: Repupublican Authoritarianism.

If you would back dems long enough to get supermajority they could pass voting reforms which make your ideal possible.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

You seem to think corporate dems actually care that they lost. They would rather enjoy their donor money and lose elections than legislate policy supermajorities of Americans both republican and dems support.

Blue no matter who is a failed strategy and it’s why we have what we have today. Stop ass kissing dem leadership. We owe them nothing. They owe us policy proposals and to fight for our cause, not the other way around.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Political donations are heavily regulated and are used only for political campaigns. You're not even allowed to promote your business in a campaign advertisement.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That allows them to give themselves a salary equal to half of a congressman's salary (50% * $174,000 = $87,000) while they campaign for office, in the assumption it would be hard to work a full time job at the same time.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

You’re just going off on tangents, over half of congress are millionaires.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

More than half of Congress' networth is held by its top 12 members. Being able to earn no more than half of a congressional salary while campaigning allows poorer people to run for Congress when they otherwise could not afford to leave their job.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago

I suppose not, I guess if the only two choices are for or against “christofascist oligopoly” I’ll just stand back and make fun of you for making that choice

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

By standing back you make a choice.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago

You’re suggesting that by making a choice you could stand back further which is untrue

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

By making the correct choice you could have saved lives who depended on Medicaid, SNAP, the VA, and Meals on Wheels which all currently have all funding frozen by Trump.

There is blood on the hands of the abstainer equal or greater than the blood on the hands of Republicans.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

That’s ridiculous, you’re just taking the bait of the DNC leadership and trying to blame voters when the blame rests fully on them for their shitty candidates

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

And by don't criticize them before the election, he means the 2077 election. Give them time to figure things out, guys.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

there has to be a real fear of losing something, otherwise there's no pressure to change. they will never change voluntarily. and after they win/lose an election there is zero pressure to do anything

the best time to criticize is in the immediate lead up to an election

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

That's fair, I normally try to shut down the shitting on all the time, but that's a very fair point to be making and I accept your views as veritable and righteous.

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
269 points (95.3% liked)

News

39127 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS