this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
93 points (97.0% liked)

News

24599 readers
4741 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The largest college sports governing body in the country made the change following President Trump’s executive order banning trans girls from girls’ school sports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

"The whole point of having negro sports leagues is because it's unfair to have them compete against whites. Trying to impose fairness with something designed to be unfair is folly."

Followed by:

"There's no rule saying that negroes can't play in the National League."

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's not even close to similar since race has no significant bearing on physical capabilities as is easily proven by the Olympics results even when black people were still being excluded in North America.

The top female athletes get absolutely wrecked at strength based sports by even mediocre male athletes. Just go look up the Williams sisters vs Braasch (tennis)

Anyone who keeps claiming that trans athletes have zero benefit are lying to themselves. There are some who have no benefit, especially if they transitioned pre-puberty, but it's clear as day biologically that they were literally doping for a decade of their development if they transitioned later.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can you show the results where cis women and trans women have competed where it is "easily proven" that they always have an advantage?

Do you really think Britney Griner has a disadvantage over all trans women?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Why does every trans athlete have to be better than Britney Griner for it to be unfair?

That's an unreasonable stance.

Women's sports leagues exist to eliminate men from competing where it would be unfair. Letting in anyone who surpasses ANY woman in that league simply because they were doping with Testosterone as a teenager breaks the entire spirit of why that league exists.

There was an example of a high school wrestler who was transitioning to male that was forced (he wanted to wrestle in the boys category) to compete against girls and went 52-0 that season.

I have no problem with Trans athletes competing in open or men's leagues, but there hasn't been a single trans man that has ever participated in the Olympics because without the benefit of natural testosterone during development they simply can't compete at that level. There was one trans man who almost made the Olympics (he got to the trials leading up to the Olympics) but he didn't succeed in making it there.

No matter how much we want to be inclusive, and I'm all for being inclusive as much as possible, if we've intentionally created a lower category for competition then it should only include the people who actually belong in that category.

We should just rename the categories from Mens and Womens to be "Over X Testosterone from ages 10-20" and "Under X Testosterone from ages 10-20" because that's what they were really meant to represent.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You said it is easily proven that they always have an advantage and you are basing it on one single high school wrestler.

That is not even close to being easily proven.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I did not use the word always in any of my comments on this thread.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If it isn't always, then there isn't an unfair advantage any more than being excessively tall is an unfair advantage in basketball.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 minutes ago

That's not how fairness works.

If one man shows up to every woman's weight lifting competition and wins every time and at the same time three other men show up and place last every time, the situation is still unfair to women because someone still had an unfair advantage.