this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
231 points (94.9% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2529 readers
1001 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 95 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (43 children)

Relevant to note that every other bid comes from the same bidder, j_s_0e6b87. Here's what I'm guessing about them:

  • They likely know about Hexbear, since they were bidding on the address right off the bat.
  • They aren't a domain squatter. A domain squatter would try to minimise the amount of money spent on a domain; and yet they're bidding too early, too frequently, and values considerably higher than the necessary to be the top bidder.
  • They aren't using automated tools, since the the times and values between the others' bids and theirs are too erratic.
  • Either they don't plan to actually win the bid, OR they have lots of money (to the point that US$710 is pocket change for them) and really, really bad blood against Hexbear.
[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The other possibility is that its 2 hexbearites who are trying to save the site, not realising they are bidding against each other. Would be pretty silly if that was it.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I went and read the hexbear thread on this. Here's some summary from over there:

  • Current hexbear admins lost the domain because the registration was controlled by a single inactive / flaky admin.
  • hexbear admin stated an intention to bid in this auction to get their name back.
  • chapo.chat is a temporary domain solution only.
  • they are also deciding on backup names if they don't win the auction
[–] Heyting@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago

No one on hexbear is wasting money on the domain. The consensus is that the money is much better spent on mutual aid.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)