476

Summary

Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell claims Republicans fear criticizing Donald Trump due to threats against them and their families.

He says Trump’s social media attacks provoke harassment, forcing lawmakers to consider costly security measures. This fear, he argues, is eroding GOP support for Ukraine and discouraging opposition to Trump’s policies.

Other figures, including Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney, have echoed these concerns. Elon Musk has also pressured Republicans by funding primary challenges.

Some GOP lawmakers reportedly faced FBI warnings of credible death threats for opposing Trump-backed nominees.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago

How so? Do you own any guns to protect us?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because if we actually did what they did for the Civil Rights, show up to DC in the hundreds of thousands, they wouldnt have the balls to call the military death squads. Without even entering, we would win. No man is without fear. Everyone is scared. You either allow the fascists to take over or you dont. There is no path that allows a peaceful way forward without action.

[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

They would absolutely call the military death squads.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago
[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

I mean, that's like 3 or 4 missiles from a helicopter or drone. The US military would logistically have no problem taking out that many people.

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Looks like a target-rich environment for raking belt-fed machine gun fire. Tiananmen Square had a lot of determined, angry people show up too.

Might wanna pack more than some picket signs.

[-] WagyuSneakers@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

No, they absolutely still would. The amount of people means less than nothing. That is absolutely on the table with them.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's plenty more bootlicker MAGA loyalists, who all have enough firearms to equip quadruple their numbers and pacify a crowd double that size. You underestimate their rabid stupidity, which is how these dipshits got into power in the first place. Fuck Trump and fuck MAGA, but dont forget Democrats are all toothless finger waggling pearl-clutchers and allowed this to happen.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

Tiananmen Square had like 1.5m people at one point. Thousands hurt or killed. But that was just army tanks and soldiers.

They didn't have any of the fancy dispersal shit they do now.

Plus if there were ever a march the size of the March on Washington, they'd close access to DC.

No bridge crossings, no ferries, no subways.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The Civil Rights protestors didnt care about any of this (though they couldn't care about Tiananmen yet).

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

They had a commander in chief that supported them. So long as they kept their word, he did

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Cool, did Sri Lanka? Did the miners at Blair Mountain? Did Italian People in July of 1943? Did fucking Sonic the Hedgehog in Egg City?

If lack of official support stays your feet they never intended to move in the first place.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
476 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31022 readers
2984 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS