476

Summary

Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell claims Republicans fear criticizing Donald Trump due to threats against them and their families.

He says Trump’s social media attacks provoke harassment, forcing lawmakers to consider costly security measures. This fear, he argues, is eroding GOP support for Ukraine and discouraging opposition to Trump’s policies.

Other figures, including Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney, have echoed these concerns. Elon Musk has also pressured Republicans by funding primary challenges.

Some GOP lawmakers reportedly faced FBI warnings of credible death threats for opposing Trump-backed nominees.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] UnexpectedBehavior@lemmy.world 232 points 2 years ago

That's what fascism feels like.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago

Yep. Fascism doesn't work without a dedicated cult of personality, and that's exactly what Trump has with his legion of MAGA asshole-idiots who are willing to commit violence for their messiah.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 73 points 2 years ago

You're not allowed to say that or invoke Hitler until we're all in gas chambers! You're only allowed to call it out after it happens! You're supposed to believe the liars until people start writing the history of the events!

-Magoos

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Historically, the problem of "this is just like Hitler!!!" has been the way in which it numbs people to the invocation.

That is, in no small part, the appeal among conservatives of calling everyone from Hegel to Whole Foods a form of creeping fascism. Putting every liberal politician (and a fair number of conservatives) in Hitler Cosplay helped diminish the idea of an authoritarian police state to seat belt laws and smoking bans.

The flip side is that stodgy NYT Op-Ed Writers who casually reject that any fascist impulse exists at all. Everyone from Fransisco Franco to Sheriff Joe Arpaio was just interested in Law & Order. The game of explaining why a given genocidal policy or nakedly fascist aesthetic is actually something different, you idiot, you imbecile, goes right up to the point of denying migrant detention camps along the border and mass extermination of Semitic people in the Middle East and trillionaires doing the "Roman" salute are what they clearly appear to be.

In the end

gets you coming and going.

It becomes a casual invective to describe even the most mildly distasteful political views and a "you're just being hysterical" rebuttal to any policy that is quite literally adopting mass extermination.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 21 points 2 years ago

They can't kill all of us.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago

How so? Do you own any guns to protect us?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because if we actually did what they did for the Civil Rights, show up to DC in the hundreds of thousands, they wouldnt have the balls to call the military death squads. Without even entering, we would win. No man is without fear. Everyone is scared. You either allow the fascists to take over or you dont. There is no path that allows a peaceful way forward without action.

[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

They would absolutely call the military death squads.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago
[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

I mean, that's like 3 or 4 missiles from a helicopter or drone. The US military would logistically have no problem taking out that many people.

[-] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Looks like a target-rich environment for raking belt-fed machine gun fire. Tiananmen Square had a lot of determined, angry people show up too.

Might wanna pack more than some picket signs.

[-] WagyuSneakers@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

No, they absolutely still would. The amount of people means less than nothing. That is absolutely on the table with them.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

Tiananmen Square had like 1.5m people at one point. Thousands hurt or killed. But that was just army tanks and soldiers.

They didn't have any of the fancy dispersal shit they do now.

Plus if there were ever a march the size of the March on Washington, they'd close access to DC.

No bridge crossings, no ferries, no subways.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's plenty more bootlicker MAGA loyalists, who all have enough firearms to equip quadruple their numbers and pacify a crowd double that size. You underestimate their rabid stupidity, which is how these dipshits got into power in the first place. Fuck Trump and fuck MAGA, but dont forget Democrats are all toothless finger waggling pearl-clutchers and allowed this to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

So then you're saying they need more threats from constituents for supporting Trump?

[-] MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago

So if there were threats against them for NOT standing up to him would it cancel the other threats out?

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago

I'm excited to find out!

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago

Tldr: Threats work and nothing will be done until they're more afraid of you than they are of fascists.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 2 years ago

You know, something like this can't happen in the USA because of the Second Amendment. I've learned this from countless of dudes on the internet that screamed endlessly about it, so this must all be a dream. Only woke nations line Nazi Germany can fall for this 🙄

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Republicans: We're in charge!

Trump and ELon's SS:

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

Fascists are cowards. We know this.

[-] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

The MAGA crowd are today's brown shirts. US democracy won't survive this term.

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 17 points 2 years ago

Knives are starting to feel extra long at night...

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago
[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

This is one situation where I think telling someone to “man, the fuck, up” is appropriate.

Protect your family, yes. But, also protect the fucking country. Step aside if you can’t or don’t act the victim when the blowback hits you.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Pretty soon they're going to be terrified of everyone for the same reason. Grow a spine, and do what's right for your country, not Krasnov

[-] WagyuSneakers@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

If a death threat makes you back down I want you out of my government. I'd consider it on par with treason or like a soldier going AWOL in combat.

Maybe we should make them more afraid of us than of them? If that's what they're signaling works.

[-] Dimmer@leminal.space 8 points 2 years ago

Is that true? I haven’t seen any Republican got hurt physically so far.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

It's easy. You call him a fat little bitch who sucks at everything and who only won because Republicans are all idiots.

And that's playing it neutral. If you like, you can start leaning into it a little.

[-] officermike@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Is there any mechanism for Congress to hold anonymous votes on topics that might upset the fragile man-baby?

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 years ago

The only thing providing ANY resistance is the fear of what happens if constituents realize their representative killed social security.

There will be no resistance whatsoever for an anonymous vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 2 years ago

I suppose fear, anxiety, stress and worry are back to being acceptable only for those not lucky enough to be monied. Moreso. Again. Smh

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Wait until the threats against them for criticizing Trump and those for not protecting their subsidies and pork barrels cross the equilibrum and start to shift the balance.

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

I mean that's what they asked for. They've seen how Putin operates and Trump has shown great admiration for his methods. So they should assume he would use those kinds of threats and alleged follow-through.

[-] inbeesee@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Counterpoint, send credible death threats when they DON'T oppose Trump's policies.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Remember when his wife made her cause ‘fight against bullying’

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Guess we'll just just have to threaten them even more physically to get the results we want then

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
476 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31022 readers
2763 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS